Re: [Idr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 20 December 2018 05:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B15C130FAB; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:12:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l70M_AOLDykj; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EBFD123FFD; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 21:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.120] (cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wBK5C6p6046390 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:12:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1545282728; bh=tL+ZhzlBBPN1/UqNVfnop1GmJ8rsgMNozGP0WVBsNdE=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=d8WJbLJgewtMM/6hD9uA1WHnnbI5pvHzyIRI+OPoKZULTx1WKWaSd0pwLlCgn8xgB /+VveLQp04Gd57P/yTCcf9sk6/cOoXodseBvN7bHVvLzw6gLebXPqgan6pkwClpxeL vOqzm8P/79zcxmWplMbit/Nf2/ivULPyKuD0Sakw=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106] claimed to be [10.0.1.120]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (16C50)
In-Reply-To: <046df70c29294a44bffc730a8e505290@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:12:06 -0600
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8E017155-D67C-4FD2-81DC-AA0DC579357A@nostrum.com>
References: <154526295343.2209.16645857016755690314.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <046df70c29294a44bffc730a8e505290@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/vGjQ9znmKLd7umZ9G-NRO8wbvf0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 05:12:15 -0000


> On Dec 19, 2018, at 10:57 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Ben -
> 
> Inline.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 3:43 PM
>> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
>> Cc: draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org; Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>om>;
>> aretana.ietf@gmail.com; idr-chairs@ietf.org; shares@ndzh.com; idr@ietf.org
>> Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: (with
>> COMMENT)
>> 
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-17: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Hi, thanks for the work on this. I just have a couple of editorial comments:
>> 
>> - abstract: Please expand BGP-LS on first mention here and in the
>> introduction.
>> While BGP is listed as a well-known abbreviation in the registry, BGP-LS is
>> not.
>> 
>> §1: Please expand BGP-LS and NLRI on first mention.
>> 
> 
> [Les:] Interestingly, even RFC 7752 does not actually expand the "BGP-LS" acronym. I would therefore like to leave the text as is on this point: " BGP-LS ([RFC7752])"

It was a non-blocking comment :-)

> 
> Regarding NLRI I agree - but if it is OK with you I will follow up on this during RFC Editor review.

That is fine with me.

Thanks!

Ben.