IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net> Sat, 15 December 2012 02:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD2921F8B6B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:30:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.528
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7galgvMpnJC5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:30:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E40221F8B67 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:30:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]) by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBF2UKX4017095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:30:20 -0500
Received: (from jrmitche@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id qBF2UJiU017093; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:30:19 -0500
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:30:19 -0500
From: Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <20121215023019.GA14973@puck.nether.net>
References: <CA+b+ERnzo2BLWjE1J_dMfYuExbG9WYJroPE4ZAWg++KK2_jy1g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm=Agr7b6JXcXOwiP4wBjnEFmnVNt5fAJrn18R0hGtSzg@mail.gmail.com> <50C78C29.3070406@foobar.org> <50C8B8D9.4090903@umn.edu> <50C9039E.1050104@foobar.org> <20121213144147.GB4524@puck.nether.net> <50CB52E0.7080602@foobar.org> <20121214174012.GA18502@puck.nether.net> <50CBB294.1000300@umn.edu> <B5907AE4-F639-4CC7-B522-B9AD92E61A51@kumari.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B5907AE4-F639-4CC7-B522-B9AD92E61A51@kumari.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5]); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:30:20 -0500 (EST)
Cc: IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:30:21 -0000

I agree Warren and was writing an email with the same suggestion.

Does anyone object to moving the range in the draft to 4200000000 -
4294967294 from the current?  I think the decimal versus bit boundary is
the one trend I see in the messages that is worth revisiting.

Jon

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 08:40:33PM -0500, Warren Kumari wrote:

> 
> So, I'd like something more human / decimal/regexp friendly like 4200000000? 
>

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status