Re: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions (11/1 to 11/16)

"Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com> Thu, 12 November 2020 04:03 UTC

Return-Path: <c.l@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A113E3A139C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:03:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vgRd-oj6IbIT for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74E2E3A139B for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CWnwK2Z16z67Kdx for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:01:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 05:03:02 +0100
Received: from DGGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.50) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 05:03:01 +0100
Received: from DGGEML529-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.220]) by dggeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.50]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:02:55 +0800
From: "Chengli (Cheng Li)" <c.l@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions (11/1 to 11/16)
Thread-Index: AdawwMcsx0c3E4kBTnmrRUqtE9KtzgH59HAA
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 04:02:55 +0000
Message-ID: <C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02CB7366@dggeml529-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <040101d6b0c2$05f080c0$11d18240$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <040101d6b0c2$05f080c0$11d18240$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.130]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7C2E1C43D652C4E9E49FE7517C236CB02CB7366dggeml529mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/vtOiyGqdcPqWsEU8LZ72QovIz4U>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions (11/1 to 11/16)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 04:03:12 -0000

Yes, support. The mechanism is useful and the extension is valid.

Cheng



From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 10:44 AM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions (11/1 to 11/16)

This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions (11/1 to 11/16).
This is the second WG LC call since the initial call had only 1 reponse besides the authors.

You can access the draft at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions/

We have a report of draft has 1 implementation from Nokia:
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions%20implementations

We are missing IPR statements from Sam Aldrin and Greg Minsky.
The co-authors should encourage these authors to submit IPR statements
by Tuesday (11/3/2020).

In your responses please consider the following questions:
a) Do you know any issues with this technology?
b) Will this technology help BGP-LS deployments?
c) Is this draft ready for publication?

If you know of any additional implementations, please
send email to the WG chairs or respond to this email
with the information.

Cheers, Susan Hares