IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call draft-ymbk-idr-bgp-open-policy - (6/6 to 6/20/2016)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 11 June 2016 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A843412D0E3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 03:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mw6XTXTpNo2d for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 03:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C8512D0C0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 03:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1bBgS4-0002du-A3; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:47:40 +0000
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 03:47:39 -0700
Message-ID: <m2h9d0q9x0.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2oa78qo1u.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <012e01d1c012$1d05f8d0$5711ea70$@ndzh.com> <CA+b+ERmCugH3kV5-yCG7=ArQGvzCeOV9Fij0=0-WqDU=YYa52A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=fcFXVdLN475QeE=5-DfdhmVd0LxBMzo4MogGcjTaYxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk_-8P0YsCC1cFEscLBMG37oaNLvXnqRABZ2kt+yuyTsw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHgCvCPFE9zAu3g_RMvM3PnmC1oBEECq6Q7n0V8Td-qhY51Yow@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=3z=wPm6dy4+OeBrp7a-+=syy1ZX_DESXfe77P1Cbumw@mail.gmail.com> <m2ziqsqy46.wl%randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERnD1kHPZ_mvSeb66TJW=XT6h9UDWfpphnJfob5yKQV03Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160611053723.GP41578@shrubbery.net> <m2oa78qo1u.wl%randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/w5aH_tkRUaqJaEq40UXxZompTrQ>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call draft-ymbk-idr-bgp-open-policy - (6/6 to 6/20/2016)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:47:44 -0000

>> I'm not convinced of the idea, but I would suggest that the draft should
>> mandate that it be possible to disable the capability by configuration.
> 
> clearly.  my bad.  i thought it was implied by 'capability' as opposed
> to a mandatory change to open.

someone privately commented that maybe the negotiation could always be
on, but there should be a relationship "it's complex"' or whatever.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email