Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Thu, 29 November 2012 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A258B21F8BA9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:27:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aIz6S89oJDYK for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:27:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com (mail-oa0-f44.google.com [209.85.219.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD3B21F8BA7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:27:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id n5so16369773oag.31 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:27:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=VeNE96/Uw9HhJh5hicjDtwV2Z2pQdHbfLxLloOHkII0=; b=D9HPsbtGEToT5TDRwbqXsy7VEa3SKQLVxWFx0TbIUptnNbbvbwYNkq4zwRFbxnUuZ9 FkL8K9Y1Qf2MuEkWozQb5SE29vM8DkckJvyKxOkfIQjie432D11G49XklCApiEsoxDjP zrtZgHzPdAZ2WXekLZbQv2btVA7Kz2loCayQdl2FGkt5HbMpsTdalOFe6bDy/OFinsh6 y4rCYvIXDke85Qba0/MwJK7dWMAgs86KqZ5fuFZrzy9BeSjV+aaxoDPB2wAMUsNsBrsG 7tFIhT3kKccbDE9ebMLgIDdzMqSQZ4d0deol7lOUVLsPjjtj5QEiREXT62OSTDg6jeHP LECg==
Received: by 10.60.19.133 with SMTP id f5mr2655910oee.105.1354217262152; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:27:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.29] (ip68-100-137-155.dc.dc.cox.net. [68.100.137.155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id aw4sm2071102oec.9.2012.11.29.11.27.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:27:41 -0800 (PST)
References: <B6B72499-E9D0-4281-84EB-6CA53694866E@juniper.net> <D704E7E3-3A95-4696-9757-9E17605E670C@tony.li> <378E396E-3F4B-4ACC-83D1-C4931524FECD@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERneavhy1gzKRSnCfN+YjYcU0+3WgBg6f68gq=tpx8yV5g@mail.gmail.com> <1AC79BDA-C088-47B4-888D-4B0428FB7C4F@puck.nether.net> <B549F708-0D5E-4B22-AC91-B6CE61B258FE@tony.li> <CAL9jLaZdX_jem0JdSGHzuhc3GDZXMDR0kvMKq5xr3D-EWYbNVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaZdX_jem0JdSGHzuhc3GDZXMDR0kvMKq5xr3D-EWYbNVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <866BC125-5820-45A6-A23B-19A0A3CC05DF@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A523)
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:27:38 -0500
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:27:43 -0000

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:19 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:
>> 
>> On Nov 29, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Internet folks will say "Do not trash our environment"
>>> 
>>> As an operator, I feel this is a fair thing for me to say. :)
>> 
>> 
>> Indeed it is.
>> 
>> However, I think it's also fair to point out that allocating a chunk from a large namespace and effectively taking out of the big I environment doesn't do much to trash it.
> 
> because private asns don't leak?
> route-views>sho ip bgp regex _64..._
> <snip>
>   Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *  27.123.19.0/24   195.66.232.239                         0 5459 38082 64549 ?
> *  41.76.104.0/21   196.7.106.245            0             0 2905 11845 64525 i
> *  41.90.0.0/16     114.31.199.1             0             0 4826 8966
> 33771 65535 64555 64555 33771 i
> *                   194.85.40.15                           0 3267 2603
> 8966 33771 65535 64555 64555 33771 i
> *  41.209.32.0/19   164.128.32.11                          0 3303 174
> 9129 9129 9129 9129 {4558,15808,64520} i
> *  131.124.1.0/24   69.31.111.244            0             0 4436 4323 64778 i
> *  131.124.2.0/24   69.31.111.244            0             0 4436 4323 64778 i
> *  131.124.3.0/24   69.31.111.244            0             0 4436 4323 64778 i
> *  131.124.4.0/24   69.31.111.244            0             0 4436 4323 64778 i
> *  131.124.5.0/24   69.31.111.244            0             0 4436 4323 64778 i

If the "private use" ASNs were NOT from a well-known range, you would detect this how?

This actually does a lot to demonstrate the usefulness of the old range, and of having a new range larger in size.

If 192.168.0.0/16 was the only RFC 1918 space, the value of 10.0.0.0/8 might not be as clear.
The analogy is pretty clear.

Not only is there value in more space, there is value in distinct ranges.

Having non-globally-unique space that is well known allows third parties to detect leaks, filter, and make permanent bogon filters.

In case it is not obvious:

Support (strongly).

The "first amendment" argument analogy holds: it isn't necessary to agree (or use in this case) to support the right to speak (use).

Brian