Re: [Idr] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03: (with COMMENT)

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

Kathleen:

 

It is best if the authors change it.  If you tripped over it – other people will as well.

 

Sue 

 

From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 10:12 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: Barry Leiba; The IESG; Chris Morrow; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03: (with COMMENT)

 

 

 

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Susan Hares <[e-mail]> wrote:

Barry and Kathleen:

I use the Latin phrases such as N.B. so it did not see it as odd.  Authors
will respond - but
Note or Note Well:  Will work with IDR chair.

 

It's fine to leave it.  

 

Thanks.

Kathleen 


Sue


-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Barry
Leiba
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 9:15 PM
To: Kathleen Moriarty
Cc: The IESG; Chris Morrow; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on
draft-ietf-idr-as-migration-03: (with COMMENT)

> Section 4.1. what is "NB:"?

"Nota bene", note well.

I have a preference for avoiding Latin abbreviations (including "i.e."
and "e.g."), and I always suggest that we not use them.  But in the
end, it's up to the authors (and the RFC Editor).  In this case,
"Note:" would work fine.

Barry





 

-- 

 

Best regards,

Kathleen