IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] IDR WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server

Mathias Handsche <mathias.handsche@de-cix.net> Mon, 16 February 2015 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mathias.handsche@de-cix.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1E01A8786 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 02:16:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cBrVrrNJkS4N for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 02:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from de-cix.net (relay3.de-cix.net [IPv6:2a02:c50:0:1e::3:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61F131A8787 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 02:16:39 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,586,1418079600"; d="scan'208";a="1559785"
Received: from ms-exchange.de-cix.net ([192.168.67.12]) by mailgw011.de-cix.net with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 16 Feb 2015 11:16:37 +0100
Received: from MS-Exchange.de-cix.net ([fe80::250:56ff:fe9e:3eea]) by MS-Exchange.de-cix.net ([fe80::250:56ff:fe9e:3eea%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:16:42 +0100
From: Mathias Handsche <mathias.handsche@de-cix.net>
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IDR WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server
Thread-Index: AQHQSdGofQciaLbRDEqU0NI9hSxQVw==
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:16:41 +0000
Message-ID: <0199D423-C24B-47E2-9C1B-1495F0F69438@de-cix.net>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.140.86]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2416518666D4D7479C63E8F027C8423D@de-cix.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/wELbvvy4DHos7zrO2mO11RdRn9E>
Subject: [Idr] IDR WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 14:32:31 -0000

Dear Chairs and WG,

we at DE-CIX operate one of the biggest Internet exchange points (IPXs) in the world:
DE-CIX Frankfurt. At our six different IXPs we highly rely on route servers. So, we have
strong experience with bird and quagga and can confirm that the implementation report is
correct.

As IETF builds on persons not companies: I strongly support publication of
draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server

Best regards,

Mathias Handsche
--
Mathias Handsche
Product Manager

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status