Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-12

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 05 May 2021 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE433A112A; Wed, 5 May 2021 07:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OKnuypz6XyR2; Wed, 5 May 2021 07:55:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FDE13A112D; Wed, 5 May 2021 07:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id f24so3307284ejc.6; Wed, 05 May 2021 07:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=32oZmEM+GF/WH9NYu/2UANkr7L/sKoZx/C/j5wggFZE=; b=gfCIVGM8yb+VkZpEUPkHraU3MVJ+IwH1QCYZcIOzJ7K4Cxplr/eJGSVIIQPCbHjxDe FKrVg6Nwmd9usrcnzWZx7fmXWt6i83q98QKCU3j0Ul95YgJrobWOGL48nNyhfQLREjJB g+4fZcw8L/JgtmrfaadOUOlxN/GmsO1poUnckuAELY/bJ7jX2Nq7bsNbkhdslVxH4lYw ScGv7m/5MMInGtYdrZj5kNxt6vqk0IxMeQ8vI7loOm7jB11Ybhq8NF/6VlhnOtndsYKH HDhWANwAFOVh7xiR54qXUrwPrVaqPdpHSHwCV8PO8MUOcD8tuJtPFeMZAb5goHIjKYBZ Bwxw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=32oZmEM+GF/WH9NYu/2UANkr7L/sKoZx/C/j5wggFZE=; b=Hq3Gr3bglzwR6J3byT6152/bTe6kX0wGl2qCoCJv1fUIpZ/uDVJuiy+ovtuJI3NAgt gFhxuNnuenc/kX5sce7Xuu6TaglBsNx2ZuljI4HBcohMDZwJoeWYN8rouBIN6wOMQ1Z8 kvNoDRxUKEVPQ7O9ykhCG6GracXINmKqxUSFLEaoyX1w/W+DXRqkYznifpYZDkA/nyOx 44DFMiioTBiR7OBvUep9kF4JafF5bEGcWAUcN56WiasTZwUxkZKv0zm7zr/sI7XogLnL UTK7FKkeUn7uWWRUHpOdY3wRTOdOUwkRhvoUc75ejZ5ZoC5A4fv8ETonz512itueBYSc UYfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532S83WBauXZP8X651RG95ZDMs/mt6yRNcopeZTwdCkyQjuqF04C ZsYOP0ONWczgL8fsgjiOik9GCNJdkGxyMZ8xHWJ6he1Xeb0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzn2A2BplzCS2TFvI9encAQBNHvo1HR+ug6dpcoVE2OOeEmBbo0W0wil2hEBa+D4qCCFGPmrSqAVtUWsiKnhbw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:c1c:: with SMTP id ga28mr10261075ejc.122.1620226488195; Wed, 05 May 2021 07:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 5 May 2021 07:54:47 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsw1Yz+MxEjiYW2E=VzwLYZ-PU+-Pd_cE_Wp8j1+tqTOtw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMMESsxqRWK2vDPyj-0_ruYoW7pkautFc09MoFBUTKxG23=tyA@mail.gmail.com> <000701d6f57c$6c20ff60$4462fe20$@ndzh.com> <DM6PR11MB319495819681585AA858E54BCDB29@DM6PR11MB3194.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESswvncvo68dYp95P+9gkgKgPpmgY3Yr-xC3=hdt-1YigYQ@mail.gmail.com> <SN6PR11MB320012D1B66CF35D18DCB212CD9F9@SN6PR11MB3200.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESszDCb70G6YbdpiAnv0mYEC52=abh89QW7cXaEdfgVzOxw@mail.gmail.com> <EBC0EE4B-063B-44A4-A74B-FCAE6EDBA511@cisco.com> <00f001d71500$db52a9d0$91f7fd70$@ndzh.com> <DM6PR11MB3194DEF968FD730D08FFFFBACD759@DM6PR11MB3194.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxjUetknSv=Q+PHxzQfx8VqgtGitr3jW84bJuZD41puOQ@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR11MB3194CAFF7F6373A8B193D1A2CD709@DM6PR11MB3194.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxhx87=zz6jTni52814wnEnhaH6VapeRG9Z7Km66jnC=A@mail.gmail.com> <DM6PR11MB319466B7490F9E5BBFF7C0AECD5E9@DM6PR11MB3194.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsw1Yz+MxEjiYW2E=VzwLYZ-PU+-Pd_cE_Wp8j1+tqTOtw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 07:54:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxxeZ_aGOyuX_HOMyurckN7+cnfDToMjM78x5+aefu_ew@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Juan Alcaide (jalcaide)" <jalcaide@cisco.com>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, James Uttaro <ju1738@att.com>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, IDR List <idr@ietf.org>, "David Smith (djsmith)" <djsmith@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000048ea0705c1966090"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/wPUXsGd17_kPiqUkdbwUMwJqjOc>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-12
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 14:55:12 -0000

Juan:

Hi!

I am starting requesting that this document be placed on the May/20
Telechat, which means that we need the update to be completed by May/14 —
along with addressing any other reviews that might come in before then.

Thanks!!

Alvaro.

On April 30, 2021 at 3:55:55 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana.ietf@gmail.com)
wrote:

On April 30, 2021 at 2:33:19 PM, Juan Alcaide wrote:


Juan:


Hi!

Just one point:

...
> --> I originally added AS_CONFED_SET because the
> [I-D.ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set] is not an RFC yet. But I'll
gladly
> remove AS_CONFED_SET reference for clarity if that's ok.
> And just add a note in case it's not deprecated yet. Only concern is that
it
> was (could have been) mentioned in both sections 4.1 and 5. So I thought
> perhaps the best place to add the note would be at the end of the
> introduction. My proposal:
>
>
> Throughout this document, some references are made to
> AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE AS_PATH segments. If AS_CONFED_SET ASPATH
> segments are supported, same considerations MUST apply to them.
> Note, however, that AS_CONFED_SET segments are expected to be
> deprecated per [I-D.ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set], and thus
> support for them will soon not be required.

Suggestion:

   Throughout this document, some references are made to AS_CONFED_SEQUENCE
   segments; see Sections 4.1 and 5.  If AS_CONFED_SET segments are also
   present in the AS_PATH, the same considerations apply to them.  Note,
   however, that the use of AS_CONFED_SET segments is not recommended
   [RFC6472].  Refer to [I-D.ietf-idr-deprecate-as-set-confed-set] as well.

Both references should be Informative.


Thanks!

Alvaro.