IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Sat, 15 December 2012 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B5B21F84F3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:44:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hl7o4FDogaG2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.acquirer.com (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA51421F84D4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:44:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.foobar.org (twinkie.foobar.org [87.192.56.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.acquirer.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBFMgnUf083071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:42:56 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
Message-ID: <50CCFD49.1060307@foobar.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:44:25 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <CA+b+ERnSVvewSpftXs3FhW12-S+sgnB1SwD4L+xqFW+hhbQayw@mail.gmail.com> <7120600D-71BD-4E61-8F06-25B7C2BAE6A8@riw.us> <20121211185917.GA21813@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERnzo2BLWjE1J_dMfYuExbG9WYJroPE4ZAWg++KK2_jy1g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm=Agr7b6JXcXOwiP4wBjnEFmnVNt5fAJrn18R0hGtSzg@mail.gmail.com> <50C78C29.3070406@foobar.org> <50C8B8D9.4090903@umn.edu> <50C9039E.1050104@foobar.org> <20121213144147.GB4524@puck.nether.net> <50CB52E0.7080602@foobar.org> <20121214174012.GA18502@puck.nether.net> <50CBB294.1000300@umn.edu> <B5907AE4-F639-4CC7-B522-B9AD92E61A51@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <B5907AE4-F639-4CC7-B522-B9AD92E61A51@kumari.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 22:44:37 -0000

On 15/12/2012 01:40, Warren Kumari wrote:
> (and I sure hope I'm not the poor sod who gets allocated 4200000 or 42000000 or 420000000… :-P )

or anything in the range between 420000 -> 429999.  This falls bang in the
middle of the likely range that will be assigned to ARIN.  Let me hold my
nose for a moment and use asdot format:  as420000 == 6.26784, and I can see
this asn being assigned in the foreseeable future in the ARIN service region.

900000-999999 seems to be well outside the range of any of the current RIRs
(using current allocation techniques, there could be 6 more RIRs before
there would be any interference).

Nick

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status