Re: [Idr] IPR call relating to draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495E91203C2; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FAlsrew2UFoK; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8B0A1202CC; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 07:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=505; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1554991462; x=1556201062; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ie8He0l+Uh3w47aP7JU4JR5MOb5zH1NIE9o53OOuCuc=; b=fvc8tzt8aO9rnhu2pvVJt/PUIRqDggfb12OtRdfS0TekGLpr3jjR84Jq vri/YYaLlBj4Mc26yMAGECIe6AYDlHlJCNWhL+bQ4n21K70w+qqWQ8xHL UUHCrTxzGn64I1xz9AG+esvw1VAYh66HQuxmG65Yga0P3/c78gVfnR1a6 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AJAADlSK9c/xbLJq1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUwMBAQEBCwGCeFABIBKNMIwVJZhIgXsQI4RJAoYVNgcNAQEDAQEKAQIBAm0cDIVLAQUdG0EQCw4KLlcGAQwIAQGDHgGBdQ+sbIRFQUCEXgWBMAGLXYFAP4E4DIJfPoJhAgMBhz4Dkj2TYAmCB4YHjAQGGoF2iWmJDYtdhiiODYFWCCmBVjMaCBsVgyiLDIVBPQORIAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,337,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="11326717"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 11 Apr 2019 14:04:17 +0000
Received: from [10.147.24.23] ([10.147.24.23]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x3BE4GAU025088; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:04:17 GMT
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
References: <024d01d4f069$d9885590$8c9900b0$@ndzh.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <429acad9-91d4-3813-d770-3dec4ea94c2a@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:04:16 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <024d01d4f069$d9885590$8c9900b0$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.147.24.23, [10.147.24.23]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/wV8JBdCAVKa3I2XiTnPvECtRUpI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR call relating to draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:04:29 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

thanks,
Peter


On 11/04/2019 15:24 , Susan Hares wrote:
> This is IPR call for draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-01.txt.
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo/
>
>
>
> All authors of this draft should respond whether they know of IPR
> related to this draft.    I would appreciate if all authors would
> respond to this IPR call even if you responded in 2018.
>
>
>
> Susan Hares
>
>
>
>
>