Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01
Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 25 December 2014 19:35 UTC
Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDAB1A1A46 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:35:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.022
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MANGLED_TOOL=2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qWSjcF_JzRDO for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22d.google.com (mail-ie0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E2931A1A06 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:35:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id y20so8844251ier.4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:35:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lRMPHGe0D6g0/fDcc4ETKv8n2oMEN8mKbj4yn8J69UA=; b=BmpbUbJmeTmizZfary3pGLeqnPo7npg5mHxH0+mffjzfZ1KmkNhfrH4h7xn9fHcWPO v69HZtU3va5Mo95d9sH1/cFWwXkvfWM3dWikL872Tiem7PtYfxldPkVHW80gr1azYu9H ZJVgMdakV+wLq6bRuDExX0ViQzo65oqPk6vDmaR4EHyu4zQxmt9mMOpYYA32itiFpU0h Jn/QPV8g6FZYuKGH0Z+LoPi1kNCzTF4m5C4S497fyQmvCv+ieUHaqtdH0jstLp+YtdZm gZ1RxODemNUh2YOcHK4U3u++v+DXXN9IM6C1YD882fgEuv6V5VWCU9hklPdMwbZuRg/H c+YA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.44.104 with SMTP id d8mr31869848igm.9.1419536134837; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:35:34 -0800 (PST)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.152.130 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Dec 2014 11:35:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <68EFACB32CF4464298EA2779B058889D24C778C7@PDDCWMBXEX503.ctl.intranet>
References: <DB4PR06MB576D18C5E4A6B1AE49BA8C39E550@DB4PR06MB576.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <68EFACB32CF4464298EA2779B058889D24C778C7@PDDCWMBXEX503.ctl.intranet>
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 20:35:34 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ngSceS19UNScMN8FYC1QON_3QqM
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmwQs+9fxJ+Gj=vCkDffZ52agcx8kEQVTMgOwJPPSaQ9A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: "Smith, Donald" <Donald.Smith@centurylink.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/wtWJRPv_Wi6-SXcDgHWp7cVJjU8
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 19:35:38 -0000
The question here is what should be the default behavior. With your suggestions "MUST be able to be disabled" the default is ON which I think would be wrong. If anything one may consider: "MUST be able to be enabled" Cheers, r. On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Smith, Donald <Donald.Smith@centurylink.com> wrote: > Good catch, I think: MUST be able to be disabled per peer/AS/session (so you > can offer it intra peer, where when you want.) > > > > (coffee != sleep) & (!coffee == sleep) > Donald.Smith@centurylink.com > ________________________________ > From: Idr [idr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO > [luismiguel.contrerasmurillo@telefonica.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 11:15 AM > To: idr@ietf.org > Cc: shares@ndzh.com > Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01 > > Hi all, > > > > I do support the adoption of draft-xu-idr-performance-routing as WG > document. > > > > I have however a comment. In section 9, Security Considerations, bullet a, > it is mentioned that “it MUST disable Performance Routing Capability > negotiation between BGP peers which belong to different administration > domains.” As stated along the draft, the performance-based routing > capability is created to offer performance route selection criteria to > customers of service providers which own networks formed by different ASes. > In my understanding those customers are clearly different administration > domains with regard the one of the service provider. Then Performance > Routing Capability has to be enabled in that cases. So I would relax the > sentence in the way: “it MAY be disabled …” or something like that, to be > consistent with the aim of the draft. > > > > Thanks > > > > Best regards > > > > Luis > > > > From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@ndzh.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:37 PM > To: idr wg > Cc: Xuxiaohu; John G. Scudder > Subject: WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01 > > > > This is to begin a 2 Week WG adoption call for > draft-xu-idr-performance-routing-01 (12/23/2014 to 01/6/2014). The draft > can be accessed at: > > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xu-idr-performance-routing/. > > > > In your response, please discuss the pros/cons of this approach and indicate > “support” or “no support”. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Sue Hares > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, > puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso > exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el > destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, > divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la > legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que > nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su > destrucción. > > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and > confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or > entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the > sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete > it. > > Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, > pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo > da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário > indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou > cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. > Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique > imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição > This communication is the property of CenturyLink and may contain > confidential or privileged information. Unauthorized use of this > communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have > received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender > by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the communication and any > attachments. > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr >
- [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-performan… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Mach Chen
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… ALBERT, Benoit (ca-cib)
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Lucy yong
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… christian.jacquenet
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Smith, Donald
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… stephane.litkowski
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Uma Chunduri
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Haoweiguo
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Autumn Liu
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Xuxiaohu
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… bruno.decraene
- Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-xu-idr-perfo… Xuxiaohu