[Idr] Comments on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis
Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com> Fri, 31 May 2019 06:28 UTC
Return-Path: <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB843120026; Thu, 30 May 2019 23:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1QJlhGbdzNsb; Thu, 30 May 2019 23:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32045120052; Thu, 30 May 2019 23:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C352785B219D9AFA0E04; Fri, 31 May 2019 07:28:49 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 31 May 2019 07:28:49 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 31 May 2019 14:28:37 +0800
From: Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
To: "draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org>
CC: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Comments on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis
Thread-Index: AdUXd/x/5Q2EPrkLTJqVc1rN98FLhw==
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 06:28:36 +0000
Message-ID: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858E5BAA1E0@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.202.166]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858E5BAA1E0NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/xbvAiIBwo_2Gy-Nbpv2_pnr-zVQ>
Subject: [Idr] Comments on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 06:28:54 -0000
Dear authors,
I have read this document and found that some text may have questions.
#1
4.2.9. Type 9 - TCP flags
…
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| e | a | len | 0 | 0 |not| m |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
Bitmask format
[Shunwan] The “Bitmask format” here should be “Bitmask operand format” .
#2
4.2.10. Type 10 - Packet length
Encoding:<type (1 octet), [op, bitmask]+>
[Shunwan] The “bitmask” here should be “value”.
Please correct me if I didn't understand it correctly, thank you！
Best regards,
Shunwan
- [Idr] Comments on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Idr] Comments on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis Christoph Loibl