Re: [Idr] Status of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param?

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 11 July 2019 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94998120155 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GIrD6MC6Ccnt for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8848312008B for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.25.161.218;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Jeffrey Haas'" <jhaas@pfrc.org>, "'Robert Varga'" <nite@hq.sk>
Cc: <idr@ietf.org>
References: <c28cbce0-2033-1224-eb73-be81fc436390@hq.sk> <20190711141919.GC4922@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190711141919.GC4922@pfrc.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 15:49:54 -0400
Message-ID: <00cd01d53821$cfaa5320$6efef960$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKBpUx5vJi1ul2JlCuez0PwmGmdQAFNHv6qpWKP3BA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190711-4, 07/11/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/xfXh6heT-VYmA0grdZQ1JvhxoRg>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Status of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:50:12 -0000

Do you still want an early allocation?  We can suggest the value you already
have used. 

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Haas
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 10:19 AM
To: Robert Varga
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] Status of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param?

Followup, since this also popped up on my TODO:

Juniper and Nokia have implementations.

I requested in 2016 an early allocation on the BGP optional parameter code
point.  This has not been done.

I believe once we have a re-publish of the document that we should proceed
with a working group last call.

-- Jeff

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 01:56:09PM +0100, Robert Varga wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> what is the current status of draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param?
> 
> The document itself is expired and looking through archives I only 
> found the June 2016 discussion which resulted in -05 and Jeff's July 
> 2016 mention the draft is being deployed and missing an early allocation.
> 
> Has the document been actively abandoned, or is it just something that 
> fell through the cracks?
> 
> Thanks,
> Robert
> 




> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr