IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

"chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn" <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn> Tue, 03 November 2020 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B123A15BD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 02:10:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kSJACLpbmcoT for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 02:10:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.223]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D19E3A0EF3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 02:10:23 -0800 (PST)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.48:26506.1011772052
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-112.67.85.135?logid-b0a480471acd486392ac6161d972d512 (unknown [172.18.0.48]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id E0F91280079; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 18:10:18 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 44093218@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.48]) by App0024 with ESMTP id b0a480471acd486392ac6161d972d512 for shares@ndzh.com; Tue Nov 3 18:10:21 2020
X-Transaction-ID: b0a480471acd486392ac6161d972d512
X-filter-score: filter<0>
X-Real-From: chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.48
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 18:10:17 +0800
From: "chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn" <chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <055301d6b0dc$f84da4a0$e8e8ede0$@ndzh.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.18.95[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2020110318091505258226@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart480683164034_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/xsuYrnIk9IU_L1jcSB7ccdFmV6k>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 10:10:31 -0000

Hi, WG,
    I have reviewd the draft. It provides a useful method to support ifit application.
    I support the adoption of this draft.



HUANAN CHEN（陈华南）
数据通信研究所
中国电信股份有限公司研究院
Data Communication Research Department
Research Institute of China Telecom Co.,Ltd.
Tel：020-3863-9346
PH：133-1609-7163
QQ：17335837
Mail：chenhuan6@chinatelecom.cn
   13316097163@chinatelecom.cn 
 
From: Susan Hares
Date: 2020-11-02 13:56
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/2/2020 to 11/16/2020). 
 
The draft can be accessed at: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu/
 
The authors should provide IPR statements by 11/5/2020 so the IDR WG can consider the IPR status in their 
decision. 
 
This draft adds the IFIT sub-TLV to the BGP Tunnel Encaps attribute for the SR policy tunnel type. This sub-TLV is only valid for SR Policy tunnel types.  Within the IFIT  sub-TLV value field, 5 sub-TLVs may be included (4 for IOAM and 1 for Enhanced Alternate Marking).   
 
The IDR co-chairs thank the authors for their patience.  The WG adoption call for this draft has been delayed by the process of switching shepherds for BGP Tunnel Encaps draft.  Many BESS and IDR drafts currently refer to the BGP tunnel encapsulation drafts. 
 
In your review of this draft, please differentiate between the following: 
·         Support/rejection of In-situ Flow Telemetry (IFIT) as a IP routing technology,
·         Support/rejection of alternate marking as a IP routing technology,  
·         Support/rejection of adding new sub-TLVS for SR Policy tunnel type of BGP Tunnel Encap Attribute, and   
·         Specific issues with the descriptions of these features in the draft. 
 
Cheers, Susan Hares

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status