Re: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)

Ahmed MostafaSaleh ElSawaf <aelsawaf.c@stc.com.sa> Thu, 09 April 2020 07:05 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=236806ae59=aelsawaf.c@stc.com.sa>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D805A3A0C5B for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 00:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kW8t7PIIMcRa for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 00:05:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ESGRYBM03.stc.com.sa (esgrybm03.stc.com.sa [212.118.156.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD3A3A09D8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 00:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: d4769c58-cafff7000000df62-bb-5e8ec9252c50
From: Ahmed MostafaSaleh ElSawaf <aelsawaf.c@stc.com.sa>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, 'IDR List' <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)
Thread-Index: AdYGjhUttAt3lPHsTfmnpSciWcUkAAGM7EUQAF7Y6MA=
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 07:04:55 +0000
Message-ID: <c15b3e8406a74433ab6c39a5087f29b4@stc.com.sa>
References: <01a201d6068f$c1f3aaf0$45db00d0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_c15b3e8406a74433ab6c39a5087f29b4stccomsa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA5VUa1ATVxRmN4SswJU1PHKJonG1I74QEjqCA7ZqrQ9G64DTodUGk7CS1LCJ 2QTBOpWqFdHKKFKLqPgCH0GEonYEoQq+UUZFwRfSOiDFBF90kNLx0bssj0V/NT92znznnu98 +c65lxBJK4GcMDBW2sJojJSbu+tRn5+LJ350JUMdfNUZGOZ40IKHvW5zuH6Kz87L68Jn73Te ES/Av07FIrQaa1KMIYGZNDVCwzAmq8ZKK+JpVhdJxSycoZjGQwYTw1IKQ3wkFUopzEaNjk6k GWskpTGbaSaemuqu+OAXgY4ZGAXN6EzxBiYhkpoT88XEsLCPwyeGUFMX6mmFgVlqsiQuOe6h r7hUJzY3qZMv7coUpWKO6I3YIAKSofB8Wa0bF7uRYbB+Y7mEi33ICFi/KU3Exd7kcujMzRXx uAXe6LyF8fEUWOpswjdiBOFKjoYPakdwMCDDYXH7QwkHS8nJ8EgBzsEY6Qc7q492xyJSBu83 78F5BSTMK78u4mNf+KTprZg/swSm1zglPOUQeGVHsyt/xh9WHr7rugUjcwRUOYKSHEEJj0+A e0+3u/HxeHhwn1PUG18724QL8b2YxI75zIyZFf3V9HnBqiDWqgvSmRKDWE0JhuZ9O2lX7CnM 3vEsqAojCYzyBDl/paulYk0Sm5JYhaVhBE7JQVRItFrqrTXFp+g1rD6OtWkTDSyLpkv5gupz GWrp4L6cxWakWcoHjDyPYNAHa23GZYjo9YUMIRFDr2CNtBWtHzUclBk3q6UyQRPWbNAZTDY2 zmYxVmGQECHaqDXoEIjXpKykLSa+WRWmQ+PaKpL76kxokxlrXIhKGa5UKlXKkJBw1f+DKRm4 kYk0kglooZfRtJm29HbZjuZPBQDMxcVF6mehE+jkpQYjki60A4Lll1D1EGGad0QGHGWbEK8w 021KAHg2DiUGMAp8GQmSb6O/LB/YcKA1ODGI88dd7sOia0VbNDYrchxd0DgW3dAqbA1GeFL+ vHIpa9YkIlio2gdc41SD3hSv2Bu0cqP17EW71fqDBu5oH4tAaQAQm5BSv/4GQpXV2CGMqLyQ u19EvLTnoW8n95W6MiaGlg8DygJU6suV6m3MQFPlMnCG60kKst0K5X7AJQslvAQJTiSiizW/ R9evU64AOFflP6CZUKoDy8fRVYBgb+QyNEv0PL7nlzcovcg505Ph7ZKCfRzo0QN2uwUB7F6H Hkxg1jDeLN8+cqEAZT6Gnpc6d5jdegCH2Sc7cJib8ZsYZr6rkMANLY8lsLXx+iBY9G6DB7z2 ZrcHPJ9T7AnzTjUDmP3HaS9YcvMXEnZt3j0E3m075wvfnrosh38/b5fD6nXlQ2HqixsBsKOl ZjhMb143Aj6x1ylgydafKFi+L4NCVJ2jYG3Hj6Nh1w9rA+G2x9sD4aPTjrGw7eH9cTDnaet4 mJ2+LRimZz0LdnCbhfdvFnrxP9iseu0mbrN6Ur2bFctu5jarB+3ZLA8O7GMZsFndKb/+BkK3 5Kn48C2NhtVFk8EYkWrar59bkvcUL2rUTlcttBdWHiHIKbPfNcydKSl9+nx+/ou5/h2LX9QW nmCSo+p32+bjY9MO7Wko+Kcl+t6XRa9GrDqr3/mmLWt/Q3hIuexAyo7196oXE6krti8qnHli nT22ZPAZd8eawzL9d//+Xlr+MqbiwUmv+1HOwjkt8+q87EcPfJ+a9uabNdkNXaFzD05Qalt8 ZSu17qMeyl5JgiZltw9NUpePWXvuWErUlElDn1Z89smM0ENnL5csqL4zzbnrTLg4p8DEzEop Cj8mBs7LNXU3DXkXA1XzzGX5305W3HqUf/v4hurVmbh0/SLr2FV2y3r1n1tqrqoam0dmEZQr q9eEjBNZWM1/JPL34dQHAAA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/y-sLHm96fCufElcYu8zO56e7H1o>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 07:05:14 -0000

Dears

I believe it is valid use case , I add my voice to support the adoption

The adoption of SR is increase within SP and PMTU is an important and Major topics that should be handled in right way

For below question


1) Is there a need for this mechanism in networks using
        MPLS-SR or SR-V6 and SR policy?

The problem statement is clear , and the answer Yes. It is vital requirement to have a right encapsulation for SRv6 without take in the consideration the underneath environment.


2) Are there any error handling issues besides what is being
     Taken care of in RFC7752bis-03.txt


3) Do you think this draft is ready to be adopted?
     In this category, please list any concerns you have
     regarding adoption.  This category can include
     general concerns about BGP-LS, MPLS-SR,
    SR-V6, and SR-Policy.



No Concern







Thanks




BR
Ahmed El Sawaf

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 3:36 PM
To: 'IDR List' <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt

You can view this draft at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu/

This draft distributes path maximum transmission unit for the
SR policy via BGP.

Any discussion regarding on whether one desires
SR Policy should be clearly distinguished from the
Technical discussions on the mechanisms to pass SR policy MTU.

The questions for the people to discuss on this draft are:

1) Is there a need for this mechanism in networks using
        MPLS-SR or SR-V6 and SR policy?


2) Are there any error handling issues besides what is being
     Taken care of in RFC7752bis-03.txt

3) Do you think this draft is ready to be adopted?
     In this category, please list any concerns you have
     regarding adoption.  This category can include
     general concerns about BGP-LS, MPLS-SR,
    SR-V6, and SR-Policy.

Cheers, Sue Hares






The information in this email may contain confidential material and it is intended solely for the addresses. Access to this  email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the email and destroy any copies of it, any disclosure, copying, distribution is prohibited and may be considered unlawful. Contents of this email and any attachments may be altered, Statement and opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender, and do not necessarily  reflect those of Saudi Telecommunications Company (STC).