Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Fri, 21 December 2012 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3E821E803D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:52:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OGYLfY8+HSaX for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs-m.tc.umn.edu (vs-m.tc.umn.edu [134.84.135.97]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D2C21E803C for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oa0-f71.google.com (mail-oa0-f71.google.com [209.85.219.71]) by vs-m.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:52:04 -0600 (CST)
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] mail-oa0-f71.google.com [209.85.219.71] #+LO+TR
X-Umn-Classification: local
Received: by mail-oa0-f71.google.com with SMTP id n12so17234832oag.10 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:52:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=gQhUMl1sVbVWEfwQmhxw3Lc/o3nsXhfYCyb6vwom6Do=; b=KPD8yWu30P1a4A08HStw2WPQq8qplgFQzylgCVuCloL3xbttxkymUfdKjFvQnPHakL u/G0yn+JDnZfTsv/ttMBOL9FOz6Y5YwxJl7hqfiQoSu+H4viiIiewu5s4wEllG4bhucz o+6ms4rgjbMNM9ejFVVUxg+GdBBH0R9Mx2ZOa2qbsNIsY9XjjBF/tKzZJxW/h+Hn4bJy Z1cfoM/FSSvZnRi2EkML4Cj/V2exNrWlSSFKBUXEGD2gkEYuyxSuRSyw/XCHbrM0ZZUj 20YPq38Sd53L87y0Ia6i1CUQwJ4WMb9Jrexazb60r9WJBM+Cj6e60Hf2NLE9G6HdcSee 5Rzg==
X-Received: by 10.42.94.8 with SMTP id z8mr10463916icm.36.1356051124360; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:52:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.42.94.8 with SMTP id z8mr10463910icm.36.1356051124284; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:52:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from x-134-84-88-75.nts.umn.edu (x-134-84-88-75.nts.umn.edu. [134.84.88.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s3sm8221950igb.14.2012.12.20.16.52.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50D3B2B1.1030504@umn.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:52:01 -0600
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Organization: University of Minnesota
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jon Mitchell <jrmitche@puck.nether.net>
References: <1AC79BDA-C088-47B4-888D-4B0428FB7C4F@puck.nether.net> <B549F708-0D5E-4B22-AC91-B6CE61B258FE@tony.li> <CAL9jLaZdX_jem0JdSGHzuhc3GDZXMDR0kvMKq5xr3D-EWYbNVQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121129191043.GA9189@puck.nether.net> <50D328DC.2020906@umn.edu> <20121220152721.GA3551@puck.nether.net> <50D33972.8090302@umn.edu> <50D33D9D.3070400@foobar.org> <m2bodoodtx.wl%randy@psg.com> <020a01cddefc$dd1e5590$975b00b0$@ndzh.com> <20121220223820.GA19458@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <20121220223820.GA19458@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkPVHyCgekcBt+zv9RU+WlV4bbP6AG0vptaZqeUT0LyBUpSc7+UBaZzVY3frn9qW4YSLHyjA73+YftYpTj0LCYClKQP4CxxgyL75yUpO84ggGmHIMKZz9KYp05eOlXVr6zXWIHA
Cc: idr@ietf.org, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:52:15 -0000

On 12/20/12 16:38 , Jon Mitchell wrote:
>
> I'm comfortable making the change to a capital MUST for this sentence
> and adding the appropriate reference to RFC 2119 as necessary.  I'm just
> not comfortable telling operators how to perform that action as there
> are a number of options to do so, which was my point to David (and he
> seemed to be ok with).  I will make the changes as necessary to the
> abstract where this statement exists as well.

If you go to a capital MUST on the outbound to the global Internet then 
I fine with not say everyone else MAY disregard inbound from the global 
Internet.  However, if that MUST was changed to SHOULD then I would 
would want an everyone else MAY disregard inbound from the global Internet.

> As for BCP versus info, I leave that up to the chairs, but this does not
> obsolete or otherwise change text in RFC 1930 outside of the IANA
> considerations section (RFC 1930 is primarily about justification for an
> ASN).  There is no "practice" being advocated by the draft to be best or
> current, outside of the practice of not sending Private Use ASNs to the
> Internet.

BCP is what I think it should be.

Thanks


-- 
================================================
David Farmer               Email: farmer@umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================