Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis (7/9/2021 to 7/25/2021)

JeffT <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 09 July 2021 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB673A040F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMQ3CqZbjS1x for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 301453A040C for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id cu14so1200047pjb.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:date:from:subject:thread-topic:in-reply-to:message-id :references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ITrlkeUnFwAdLVDzMj2e/Sngg10xbs5ZmtLXrCdSVlk=; b=min+L41ge3btsuFEJl52rzLA9RqeKQ7L+DyBIerSCmLQUX/mnGsgr5D2BtiIkClPlL 3DbpHE5UvEU5wINsGXevstz7dVLocaRujOZC75g2xguugytZmU9NlGunhYmChKo1ci/2 zH9ASjnI60rd16HlZnqNcAPaW+hRnsdvuPnTdoMiy1czPPg8E9IRL1lmU/AsPd84Qbhs f33Jf1uxTAqq1em6Fs50zkH/2b3hEmjqzjO9B6S8jwrV61sTnGbcns1cfRbLS4YHmliW jgcYl3qP0Jeyzy1iuwjQu3/tXk26vg8WBXlx7II1TRJH6q5yiMyEOKjLXlwfftAoOU7+ M7Rg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:from:subject:thread-topic :in-reply-to:message-id:references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ITrlkeUnFwAdLVDzMj2e/Sngg10xbs5ZmtLXrCdSVlk=; b=MrQ0KGuK2QceVmiFKit/DW0W9ddFD7g2HuXEZ9aeSN6eDM1YB/o0JOiGA9BHNHqDhU W0IWgaJ09zMHh57vPh7dJjaxMBy2f0izMszIOz5ibSI4RTlo+4l4XqTSlyGpE2zUbUFB HMp7S0Th70ONPmy7VMZswUeA7qekNV3PXCFQgt5cUt9/2VT2elUZZ3AvOaaxK6vIEmsz jm+ZBLgRSBdvtmWeLDC/U39JvNGSbtIcIN+DAOf2aEfv89jb0wp+tL4nsR3jjToDR7qp fX/89smd/jGAhBSQ6NOJoAANxg6bDPs2ah9whPj7nEzhXXM3rhwbH156z7As+45fK8EF L+cw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326rjz8xAqPJk72mCBWPCIVy5O4Sdi/iKBJpyAA8gVan/+f99V7 QSmohc/CHAVtqcT46BJS0sniK8yHHKTq3Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJD7+p8Z2yRL0Ni5wET91l7miIqYkFf8lbiLKnXLikzEKKr+PUV7UsdfzT2Cq6WxuJpyjD3A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7801:: with SMTP id w1mr40021069pjk.179.1625869597707; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jeffs-PC (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j2sm8049356pfb.53.2021.07.09.15.26.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:25:48 -0700
From: JeffT <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: RE: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis (7/9/2021 to 7/25/2021)
In-Reply-To: <00f801d77501$fbb46680$f31d3380$@ndzh.com>
Message-ID: <E3013919-2B9D-4C47-816C-0DDEFB49B974@hxcore.ol>
References: <00d201d77501$228d9480$67a8bd80$@ndzh.com>, <00f801d77501$fbb46680$f31d3380$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/y3lfDmKb3HCozLs21ECDWiD-sI4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis (7/9/2021 to 7/25/2021)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 22:26:44 -0000

Yes/support

 

Cheers,

Jeff

 

From: Susan Hares
Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 1:36 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis (7/9/2021 to 7/25/2021)

 

3 implementations exist that are aligned to the RFC7752bis:

 

See the implementation report at:

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-RFC7752bis%20implementations%20" rel="nofollow">https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-RFC7752bis%20implementations%20

 

Sue

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Friday, July 9, 2021 4:29 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis (7/9/2021 to 7/25/2021)

 

This begins a 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis-07.txt.

(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis/" rel="nofollow">https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc7752bis/)

 

This draft is a revision of the RFC7752 on the Distribution of Link-State and Traffic Engineering Information Using BGP (BGP-LS) based on experience over the last 12 years since the 2009 publication of the RFC.  

 

There is a 3rd party IPR statement on this draft.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3623/" rel="nofollow">https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3623/

 

In your comments, please consider:

1.  Is this draft ready for publication?  

2. Does this represent the status of deployed implementations?

3. Are there any critical corrections to RFC7752 which have been left out?

4. What extensions should be left to future BGP-LS drafts?

 

This draft is being shepherded by all 3 IDR chairs. 

 

Cheerily, Sue