IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 13 October 2017 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF941332D7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNw37VegInFb for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 846B0132F3E for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v9DHDJ1i056326 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:13:19 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
Message-ID: <59E10253.8000107@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 19:13:39 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.19 (Macintosh/20170908)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
CC: idr@ietf.org
References: <1F4BD63B-3273-469E-A3C6-4365B56724EA@juniper.net> <BE322BD1-EFA4-4568-B524-24139591162E@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <BE322BD1-EFA4-4568-B524-24139591162E@juniper.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/yA_RaAxg9P-QgoOqrdKylWPn0uQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-14
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 18:13:46 -0000

John G. Scudder wrote:
> Paging through the discussion so far, I see exactly one person, Job
> Snijders, has expressed what I interpret as support for publishing
> the document. I presume the authors support it, and nobody has
> expressed opposition. However, it would be quite helpful if there
> were more contributions, whether to say "ship it", or "needs more
> work", or whatever.

We are being slack.

ORR is ridiculously useful and we've needed it for years. Full support
for the doc (+ implementation clarification).

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email