Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Wed, 10 February 2021 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800183A0DAD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 23:46:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8CAIRumjV_uy for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 23:46:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8599D3A0DAC for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 23:46:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id e7so712656pge.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 23:46:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0/o/UTPEiwko9i9+XRZUzgBN6IGr+HAwfcxWc7746GA=; b=mvqTfr0TXs5Lv7KwTqa65aB8ajnj/4GqwHB8UhvMkCC/s564dBVY/1rj3PDmHHtILe RIlDS5yDclLnQyVLZJu+J3/5dtNIFRSmTZayVG5EzTg/BuKe9/rTNU7WaIuGnuI0wCia 5+EnMX32TGT43pIvnyDInIxtW4Cpc5UmFyQp6k9M0dH8Qb+2tQiTLrXAjjQHPBwmVPGN nN0zmCuUVNLzHaF/BjUFOUm1odAjE/hocWVJEPvpD17k7FJeElFFC6FBT0lg/yVxwMeh FPJbnkB1fkMeKiqsgXyGAoPXuQSkhK6k9+pN4OyDw7P4SPmkMALfLc5tUq70iBFJbJzS 524Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0/o/UTPEiwko9i9+XRZUzgBN6IGr+HAwfcxWc7746GA=; b=ohrkn7obCK5hg9OUe7TB+nn/PzjY8cpJ22D7sL7r9NMNfsPmtjSJVL7l41dNzPZcTt wBnf5YcvEQtodGJrA/lZzmJtd3BvYMX4VbgI3JKxxA1XXPeaQqJqjxWO5i2sih4pGfe5 7RKGJsYiiHHgc4kTRAC88lzF6tLHVj4Xtbrs4fckArvd8f12BHzfQ3hyygpVa8/JXj7S y2lAVMd8FRNS7LD9WQtr00iE8rwQ59/RZSDOGQVVsQl0ALjQMnfrUuuXj/5J43PLVN4M xEbzN+WLwsiipAbln/Xdny78uZY38EYpmMIiFXTyKjm+gDLY10/wfmKbEBNUWMtP75uA wXjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531m6fR1TeZl5VcXpen6RiOHaDMSKYJcLvgXHW4CyxF8wRbN/ykV CjFTUjkqw6A9QO4j7crIx4Blj0ddAxDSDYIC44lDmANHhAsF9Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzcyl309Ey0BspoEG5A9GPSnUaQcxOHHt6XSVMAx3z/V01Q0oFOLsDQVauKpdQtvt+dBSX4aD3Q0W7KyfdcKQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a62:54c3:0:b029:1bc:731c:dfc1 with SMTP id i186-20020a6254c30000b02901bc731cdfc1mr2023463pfb.20.1612943212883; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 23:46:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <010e01d6fb0b$c5c08970$51419c50$@ndzh.com> <cbb88a641502401f8410f6674797387a@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <cbb88a641502401f8410f6674797387a@huawei.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 02:46:42 -0500
Message-ID: <CABNhwV1=MO3F1DF5EwEoCj54-Lfhd21jUSivyWDK+ReFrQEU6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003f306205baf69b42"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/yBWef-Ni7RhwxfFVXiwh7-dDv7Q>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 07:46:56 -0000

I support WG Adoption as co-author.

1) Will this new ORF filter reduce routing information at key points?

Yes this feature filters dynamically and provides a  granular approach to
filter by RD originator instead of by RT.

2) Should the WG consider this draft given it has an IPR claim

Yes

or

    Would the IDR WG prefer another approach?

We have reviewed other approaches and this provides a finer grain approach
to dynamically mitigate VPN being overwhelmed by source PE RD offender.  We
have discussed other approaches and best practice such as VPN maximum
prefix as well as peer maximum prefix, however this feature resolves a gap
directly related to offending PE RD originator.

3) Is this draft ready to be adopted and refined as WG draft?
This draft is well written and solves a critical problem and I believe is
mature for adoption.

Thanks

Gyan
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 2:35 AM Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Sue,
>
>
>
> I support the adoption as a coauthor. Please see my replies to the
> questions inline:
>
>
>
> *From:* Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Susan Hares
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 4, 2021 11:38 PM
> *To:* idr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt
> (2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)
>
>
>
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-wang-idr-rd-orf-05.txt
> (from 2/4/2021 to 2/18/2021)
>
>
>
> This draft defines a new Outbound Route Filter (ORF) type, called the
>
> Route Distinguisher ORF (RD-ORF).  RD-ORF is applicable when the
>
> routers do not exchange VPN routing information directly (e.g.
>
> routers in single-domain connect via Route Reflector, or routers in
>
> Option B/Option AB/Option C cross-domain scenario).
>
>
>
> Please be aware that this draft has one IPR statement attached.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/4579/..
>
>
>
> Please consider the following questions in your review and comments:
>
>
>
> 1)      Will this new ORF filter reduce routing information at key
> points?
>
>
>
> Yes
>
>
>
> 2) Should the WG consider this draft given it has an IPR claim or
>
> Would the IDR WG prefer another approach?
>
>
>
> Yes
>
>
>
>
>
> 2)      Is this draft ready to be adopted and refined as WG draft?
>
>
>
> Yes, it defines a generic RD based filtering mechanism, which may be used
> in use cases not limited to the ones described in the current draft. More
> refinement could be done after the adoption.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Jie
>
>
>
> Cheerily, Susan Hares
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD