IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-haas-idr-extended-experimental-00.txt]

Colin Petrie <colin@spakka.net> Mon, 07 November 2016 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <colin@spakka.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD9D129860 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:55:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jRaGt9LKZgYi for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhosting.spakka.net (mailhosting.spakka.net [IPv6:2a02:af8:cafe:f00d::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92A47129841 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [193.0.20.124] by mailhosting.spakka.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <colin@spakka.net>) id 1c3lKA-00075Q-FE; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:55:02 +0000
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
References: <20161031205515.GA25507@pfrc.org> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927935045D8@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <20161102135352.GA11431@pfrc.org>
From: Colin Petrie <colin@spakka.net>
Message-ID: <c65ab9b9-e21a-6cab-c76e-74d089b83db4@spakka.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 15:55:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161102135352.GA11431@pfrc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SMTP-Authenticated-User: colin@spakka.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/yK053ibHOrfctXqrenzrGiE38L4>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-haas-idr-extended-experimental-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 14:55:06 -0000

Hi Jeff, and thanks for this draft.

On 02/11/16 14:53, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Currently this draft is tailored toward experiments and development, not
> long term deployment of features.  While the conversation is starting to
> move toward using this as a generic vendor-specific PA replacement, that's
> not the intent of the draft currently.

It may not be the intent, but some people have asked about that, and
your draft is a fairly pragmatic approach to giving each vendor a huge
playground space. If it prevents the squatting, I'm all for it :)

Anyway, fully support further discussion on this.

Cheers,
Colin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email