Re: [Idr] Review of draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-07

"RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 21 August 2020 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5453A1074 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BUI9p4mIvY-Y for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08FFF3A1073 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF15AF40798; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KQV-8sUsOue9; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.rfc-editor.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE58F40796; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:30:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 81.174.197.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rfcpise) by www.rfc-editor.org with HTTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:30:23 -0700
Message-ID: <265604361b00db402c6a36bb895e4980.squirrel@www.rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESswu=rFML41pYW-Gt_eyw+U_Aqmk+XsG4d5zPc_b7dVv9w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMMESswJfjShCjr0ZOhshWD058eosBAStOcXVAr77rv6RvFMDg@mail.gmail.com> <37f90ca874e87bd4f8b4245518cd3a3b.squirrel@www.rfc-editor.org> <CAMMESsyqTuPfxCMWO6GQCO8nc2z8+PxQVomL0HX0xQLrBLYEQA@mail.gmail.com> <63466e0fde345b64395b7d12c0ac40ca.squirrel@www.rfc-editor.org> <CAJwpseXeL4XsuaYDYsxRTa9XoO_SDpHZxM7LbNxhrH41XLV4-w@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESswu=rFML41pYW-Gt_eyw+U_Aqmk+XsG4d5zPc_b7dVv9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:30:23 -0700
From: "RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
To: "Alvaro Retana" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "Donatas Abraitis" <donatas.abraitis@hostinger.com>, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org, "IDR List" <idr@ietf.org>
Reply-To: rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/yTKloz1gjAOekU1FzovSndlbyQQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Review of draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-07
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:30:51 -0000

What Alvaro said.

:-)

Adrian


Alvaro Retana wrote:
> On August 21, 2020 at 12:32:01 PM, Donatas Abraitis wrote:
>
> Donatas:
>
>
> Hi!
>
>> By the way, should I upload a new version with fixes or send a
>> generated txt here (or pastebin/gist) to review again before pushing
>> to draft revision?
>
> If your changes are in line with what Adrian and I have discussed, I
> don't have a problem with uploading a new version. If you think there
> will be a significant deviation, especially on the points I made at
> the top, we should talk about it.
>
> The IESG will consider this document on Sep/10, so I would like to
> post the result of the conflict review by Sep/4 (so others have time
> to review it). IOW, if you post an update before then, we should be
> ok. :-)
>
> Thanks!!
>
> Alvaro.


-- 
Adrian Farrel (ISE),
rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org