IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-persistence-00

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 02 November 2011 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A5C11E80AE for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6eR-4Pa3uYHG for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail37.opentransfer.com (mail37.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7450811E8114 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11293 invoked by uid 399); 2 Nov 2011 17:06:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.52?) (83.31.220.67) by mail37.opentransfer.com with SMTP; 2 Nov 2011 17:06:42 -0000
Message-ID: <4EB17893.1060706@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:06:27 +0100
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com
References: <4EA1F0FB.3090100@raszuk.net> <4EA487E4.2040201@raszuk.net><B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550FA20750@MISOUT7MSGUSR9I.ITServices.sbc.com> <4EA84254.9000400@raszuk.net> <FE8F6A65A433A744964C65B6EDFDC24002951E94@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4EB14BDD.7040802@raszuk.net> <FE8F6A65A433A744964C65B6EDFDC24002951F8C@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <FE8F6A65A433A744964C65B6EDFDC24002951F8C@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: idr@ietf.org, ju1738@att.com
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-persistence-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:06:44 -0000

> Sure. But given the small number of RR boxes, and the high requirements
> on these boxes, it's harder to justify a two or three vendor sourcing.

I would think just the very opposite. Small number of RRs and their high 
requirements IMHO fully justify more then one vendor sourcing.

Of course fun starts where it is hard to find such diverse RRs with all 
required feature sets. Those concerned about such issues are looking 
actively in solving the problem fundamentally at it's roots and not 
cover it with yet another curtain.

Cheers,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email