IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Thoughts on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hares-idr-bgp-registries-01.txt

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Thu, 23 March 2017 18:04 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC731287A7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rCMxwcjq1Oqc for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E59127011 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 38A971E33F; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:10:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:10:53 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: 'Eric C Rosen' <erosen@juniper.net>, "'John G. Scudder'" <jgs@juniper.net>, idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170323181052.GL27015@pfrc.org>
References: <048701d29cd9$15204b80$3f60e280$@olddog.co.uk> <022201d29ce6$ffb2ba40$ff182ec0$@ndzh.com> <c369a60a-3ccc-bf7d-dd29-d289d7a6b67e@juniper.net> <02dc01d2a25b$a1eca590$e5c5f0b0$@ndzh.com> <3b9c229a-4573-c586-8627-3a8c38539ff8@juniper.net> <E40AC551-E802-4662-A2F5-2E8EDB3C746F@juniper.net> <c8804d0b-39e0-bb56-464c-fe1d051f2d91@juniper.net> <050901d2a3fd$734b3e10$59e1ba30$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <050901d2a3fd$734b3e10$59e1ba30$@ndzh.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/yemq_ZKwMNRxSdal_9jj9NIym3w>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Thoughts on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hares-idr-bgp-registries-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:04:30 -0000

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:46:39PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
> 4)      On code point squatting, operators had real problems with the
> current situation.   Job said "automatic checks on drafts",  Sue said "IETF
> Standard + DE of BGP chairs where IETF Consensus wins" - Got any alternate
> solutions.  Got any alternate suggestions? 

Wearing my work process hat, the issue is flagging when something needs more
eyes.  

IETF process already gives us the necessary voice in how stuff works for
allocation, I think.  It's less we need a panel of designated experts, it's
more that once something has been noticed, many voices will suggest doing
the right thing.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email