IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] New BGP capability to advertise running daemon version

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Fri, 02 August 2019 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76ED1204AD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 08:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njnK8oL57osh for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 08:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:1401:17::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C3321204A8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 08:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail3.mlpsca01.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1htZbg-0002at-Bi (job@us.ntt.net) for idr@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:36:36 +0000
Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id z23so50201974ote.13 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:36:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXMh2Dt6sdTaQEjCIOxeutb4k0inrQabwnq/MrwGBQLC6nJ6WZh xsmKQ4pwlCJ9+VeiwkovwFU+RbvKLXtER5v59Hg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxSqEDhek91n8vIeGmACoQs54DhezN2AFCgIqfL/hru1UTAU+7NBK/6idNtizKN9T9iCQ4jO7K2DHwK9Irp7sA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1249:: with SMTP id s9mr1250020otp.33.1564760195792; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:36:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPF+HwV3EEUza3FyiXsd_oSkj80OwY-tE2DgFWnynq1FL2tLHg@mail.gmail.com> <015d56c13d01436890da2b8a7179fac9@turkcell.com.tr> <CAPF+HwV2Df6qcRD+GrE_JFv8W5Yh3OACKZrdv1Bw4PXQbjtDyQ@mail.gmail.com> <20190802150251.GA11217@pfrc.org> <CACWOCC_J6-wMWx7KL2dza5A77KFnoabMt7oAY-xhsGb8Vf3O5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMFL7FVciSx1NyCp9zCPXZeRtNn4J-O1vS8btg96ZbDRuA@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC_+X2bVWa3iFmb6eQ8FVvvn98h_B12HVVundcqCsd+-Lw@mail.gmail.com> <dc99fdf4-cb19-34d9-d34b-5ef18f559326@foobar.org> <CAOj+MMHEmQmPeYjWr-v3B1HXL3wYkku57e0SnZaT5dBpYrLAJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHEmQmPeYjWr-v3B1HXL3wYkku57e0SnZaT5dBpYrLAJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2019 00:36:24 +0900
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACWOCC939gEujomMLqiwA77EkTC7XGf_jSkCOOVhTaV6JKEGvA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACWOCC939gEujomMLqiwA77EkTC7XGf_jSkCOOVhTaV6JKEGvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, Rob Shakir <robjs@google.com>, david.freedman@uk.clara.net, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a11b5a058f241f01"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/yorRQMPTm8RRc8L5ZPbX04cHRr0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] New BGP capability to advertise running daemon version
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:36:40 -0000

Dear robert,

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 00:29 Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:

> Extremely happy to see your support here.
>
> Draft wise I think we still have sources :) But what really got this work
> stuck is implementations.
>
> Perhaps if we could make FRR and BIRD to implement it we could test it and
> ask for WGLC.
>
> Of course if there is seriou sinterest we should also ask for IANA
> allocations too. I think both Rob & David would be happy to see this moving
> forward too :)
>

In order to move this forward, I think it would be good to split the draft
out into the framework and then separately document the features. This
allows the work to progress (in part), even when we encounter controversy.

Cutting this up in smaller chunks will increase the likelihood of reaching
the finish line.

It also would make RFP / feature requesting + vendor management easier if
we make sure all the documents in their entirety represent coherent
building blocks.

I’m happy to work on such a proposal with you.

Kind regards,

Job

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email