[Idr] [Errata Verified] RFC9085 (6666)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 03 September 2021 20:17 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876463A2C8F; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 13:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xlc4NTfguBft; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 13:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48933A2C8E; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 13:17:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 83D2FF407B2; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 13:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: ketant@cisco.com, stefano@previdi.net, ketant@cisco.com, cfilsfil@cisco.com, hannes@rtbrick.com, mach.chen@huawei.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210903201711.83D2FF407B2@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 13:17:11 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/yrqEP2mfI6nK03JiT4MrCDnLONo>
Subject: [Idr] [Errata Verified] RFC9085 (6666)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2021 20:17:42 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC9085, "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6666 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant@cisco.com> Date Reported: 2021-08-27 Verified by: Alvaro Retana (IESG) Section: 2.3.1 Original Text ------------- Flags: 1-octet value that should be set as: * IS-IS Prefix-SID flags as defined in Section 2.1.1 of [RFC8667]. * OSPFv2 Prefix-SID flags as defined in Section 5 of [RFC8665]. * OSPFv3 Prefix-SID flags as defined in Section 6 of [RFC8665]. Corrected Text -------------- Flags: 1-octet value that should be set as: * IS-IS Prefix-SID flags as defined in Section 2.1.1 of [RFC8667]. * OSPFv2 Prefix-SID flags as defined in Section 5 of [RFC8665]. * OSPFv3 Prefix-SID flags as defined in Section 6 of [RFC8666]. Notes ----- The reference to the OSPFv3 spec in the text above needs to be corrected to RFC8666 instead of RFC8665. This editorial error seems to have crept in during the RFC publication process. The draft version submitted by the WG and reviewed by the IESG has the correct text : https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-18#section-2.3.1 -------------------------------------- RFC9085 (draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-18) -------------------------------------- Title : Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Extensions for Segment Routing Publication Date : August 2021 Author(s) : S. Previdi, K. Talaulikar, Ed., C. Filsfils, H. Gredler, M. Chen Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Inter-Domain Routing Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Idr] [Errata Verified] RFC9085 (6666) RFC Errata System