Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-04.txt - 3/6 to 3/20/2017 - extending to 3/31

Martin Horneffer <maho@nic.dtag.de> Fri, 31 March 2017 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <maho@nic.dtag.de>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D28B12940D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I6_sb-W_Hp64 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owl2.lab.dtag.de (Owl2.lab.DTAG.DE [194.25.1.238]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EE4129412 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by owl2.lab.dtag.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C2DC44F8; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:11:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from owl2.lab.dtag.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (owl2.lab.dtag.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9E0B2xOjKUcg; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:11:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by owl2.lab.dtag.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A239C8CF0; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:11:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dhcp-8525.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-8525.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.133.37]) by owl2.lab.dtag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E088DC44F8; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:11:05 +0200 (CEST)
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
References: <035901d2a263$a204a0c0$e60de240$@ndzh.com>
From: Martin Horneffer <maho@nic.dtag.de>
Message-ID: <4c21f820-7d3e-bd73-cf95-9cd2cfeb7753@nic.dtag.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 10:11:04 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <035901d2a263$a204a0c0$e60de240$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------33A030DB630666D6F15E86E5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/zAwsgtjuWh75mtfeeaNAnVlM8o8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-prefix-sid-04.txt - 3/6 to 3/20/2017 - extending to 3/31
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:11:13 -0000

Support.

Martin

Am 21.03.17 um 11:53 schrieb Susan Hares:
>
> IDR WG:
>
> Perhaps the WG LC came at a bad time since have received only 1 
> response.  We will length the call to 3/31.  Unless with have 
> substantial input, this WG LC will not indicate consensus.
>
> Sue Hares
>