IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 04 November 2016 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01031295B0; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 09:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DzuRx-1hmRQM; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 09:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18B1129469; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 09:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 01B001E377; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:49:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 12:49:23 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Message-ID: <20161104164923.GA30743@pfrc.org>
References: <112dc01d235fd$57f9c370$07ed4a50$@ndzh.com> <C2DABF02-D3CB-4646-B869-FBCE5F05FDA1@apnic.net> <117ea01d23611$a28513e0$e78f3ba0$@ndzh.com> <CED07D95-A426-469C-85B4-DB2FBE52D14A@apnic.net> <4080cfba032744f590fcbbb710f0d618@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com> <08C97932-4E8B-4EBC-B780-3A2F54A1EEF2@apnic.net> <C85C0950-8D91-4695-A28A-FC17B9E5AFDC@pfrc.org> <043a01d236b9$f07058f0$d1510ad0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <043a01d236b9$f07058f0$d1510ad0$@ndzh.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/zMHDHbDpYmumhVEclyVgUJ8clMY>
Cc: 'IETF IDR WG' <idr@ietf.org>, rtg-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 16:46:49 -0000

Sue,

On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:38:56PM -0400, Susan Hares wrote:
> Should atomic-aggregate be deemed "historical" at this point?  This can
> happen in parallel to this work. 

I'd argue, yes.

You might recall some of the reasoning as fallout to my introduction to IETF
and the resultant churn in the 1771bis work as we tried to get the feature
to make sense. :-)

While I'm happy to write such a document at some point, it's something
that's very low priority for the WG.  In the meantime, I'll just keep
pushing back on things that refer to it.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email