[Idr] Re: Requests for adoption and WG LC

[Susan Hares <[e-mail]>]

Linda:

You asked a great question, but unfortunately, it is hard to say exactly.

We work on our queues continually.  If something gets blocked for a chair, they move down the queue.
See https://github.com/ietf-wg-idr/idr-chairs - for our weekly notes on our action per chair and as a group. items.

Realize that the chairs work down their queues in the following order to WG LC

1) Things that are returned from IESG – that need follow-up (see page 7 of the IDR chair’s slides)
2) Things in our Shepherd’s queue After WG LC  (see page 8 in IDR chair’s slides)
3) Pending WG LC ( Slide 9 of the IDR chair’s slides)

The WG LC has the following things:
1. draft-ietf-idr-4360-bis-  (Shepherd: Keyur Patel)  (top of queue because of need for bis)
2. draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip-04  (Shepherd: Sue Hares) – Returned from IESG, but -04 needs an implementation report
3. draft-ietf-idr-ts-flowspec-srv6-07 – (Shepherd: Sue H WG LC requires draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-04)
4. draft-ietf-idr-nhc-00 – (Shepherd: Sue Hares) – part of WG LC document entropy draft with 2 implementations
5. draft-ietf-idr-rt-derived-community-05 – Shepherd: Jie, awaiting Pre-WG LC review – in process, almost done
6. draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata– Shepherd: All Chairs, (Request: 7/21/2025)

ETA is hard to say.
draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata takes getting all the chairs to review and then go to WG LC.

Note that all of the one’s above it, except for draft-ietf-idr-4360bis, have been a WG LC already (in some fashion).  Now, we are trying to resolve open issues.

So – watch github and we’ll try to announce if the WG LC for  draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata is close at hand.

Sue

From: Linda Dunbar <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2025 1:10 PM
To: Susan Hares <[e-mail]>; idr <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Requests for adoption and WG LC

Sue, The following draft is on the WGLC queue: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata/ Any estimate on when the WGLC can start? Thanks, Linda  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌  ‌
External ([e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>)
  Report This Email<removed-link>

Sue,
The following draft is on the WGLC queue: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-5g-edge-service-metadata/<https://shared.outlook.inky.com/link?domain=datatracker.ietf.org&t=h.eJxVzEEOgjAQheGrmK5tCxWKuPIqQ2cKjQpmGDTReHedpds_731vs_HVnHZmErmvJ-8RBIQhXYhdIclu4dHjkjwyZLGabEG27WgJR7Ir8aMksjcS0K83-525qDiT_L511R5jXwe_TsC0nmd8TS4tN98gHKo-5SGETG2G3NX4a9Q0Q2y6Lvq6i-EQYwiVO1bKtEqT0tcyIzjc5gH4nDfZmJ5UlNUJ6uS_fr6SL0nT.MEQCIAtGGjCUeLwmP92PpHbowRAxsBIBVaKl0UXEMC-g8SfiAiANaunmR5ShvqSLKAzeAurd5m58LbCgvWeGulIZVzIXjQ>

Any estimate on when the WGLC can start?

Thanks, Linda

From: Susan Hares <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2025 2:14 PM
To: idr <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: [Idr] Requests for adoption and WG LC

Greetings IDR:

Listening to the IDR session, the drafts requested WG LC

  *   draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis
  *   draft-ietf-bess-ebgp-dmz-08 – (not sure if BGP or IDR or both)
  *   draft-ietf-idr-nhc –00

Am I correct?

All of these drafts should generate an implementation report and put it on the IDR wiki.

Listening to the IDR session, the following drafts requested adoption:
    draft-litkowski-idr-rtc-interas-03,
    draft-vroonen-idr-bgp-bestpath-nh-selection-00,
    draft-decraene-idr-nlri-error-handling-01, and
    draft-chen-idr-enhanced-dynamic-cap-02.

Am I correct?

Sue