Re: [Idr] IPR poll for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-05.txt prior to WG LC

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Sat, 08 June 2019 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3701200E5; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 08:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0PQ_NsV4zU6Y; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 08:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FCA712008F; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 08:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.177.57.113;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Nikos Triantafillis'" <nikos@apstra.com>
Cc: "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>, <draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org>
References: <06aa01d51d98$54463760$fcd2a620$@ndzh.com> <CAEak8BMzNKeFBsTr=1b9EdpB8ZxoYhwtsGd_x3kQ2T5aNf4rpA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEak8BMzNKeFBsTr=1b9EdpB8ZxoYhwtsGd_x3kQ2T5aNf4rpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2019 11:37:17 -0400
Message-ID: <083d01d51e10$0e85d6e0$2b9184a0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_083E_01D51DEE.87754850"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQMs1dWWndMQjeXMn2+RdlL1rGhA+gH2StTno9LA+wA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190607-4, 06/07/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/zdb3NF-PWv2nf9LyD23VUm99PcU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR poll for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-05.txt prior to WG LC
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 15:37:27 -0000

Nikos:

 

Thank you for sending in your IPR statement.  I have also received Greg  

 

We only await Siva Sivabalan IPR statement as a contributor before I can begin the call for consideration of the 2 IPR statements related to the document.  

 

While we wait for these IPR calls to complete, perhaps you and your co-authors can address the comments in my shepherd’s report. 

 

Cheerily,  Sue Hares 

 

From: Nikos Triantafillis [mailto:nikos@apstra.com] 
Sent: Saturday, June 8, 2019 11:17 AM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: idr@ietf. org; draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR poll for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-05.txt prior to WG LC

 

Hi Susan,

 

I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft other than already have been disclosed.

 

Thanks,

 

Nikos.-

 

On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:20 PM Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

Greetings authors: 

 

I have received IPR Statements from Authors:   Jeff Tantsura, Uma Chunduri, and Ketan Talaulikar, 

I have not received IPR Statements from Authors::  Greg Mirsky,  Nikos Triantafillis. 

I have not received IPR Statement from contributor: Siva Sivabalan
 
We will begin the WG last call after all authors and contributors have completed the IPR statements. 
 
In addition, due to the IPR claims listed for this draft, we will need to make a specific call for objections to the IPR.  

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3273/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3023/

 

I would prefer to make a call for the WGs IPR separate from the WG LC to keep the technical issues clearly separate from the WG’s technical issues.  However, I cannot start either process until all authors and contributors have sent their IPR statement to the WG. 

 

For those authors who have requested WG LC, please ask your co-authors and contributors to submit their IPR Statement quickly.   

 

We will be entering into a discussion of IDR charter prior to IETF, I want to get all WG LC started before we start the IDR Charter discussion.   

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares