Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)

Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> Mon, 07 November 2016 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144FE129465 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:09:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lmhpjT-61CCP for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B20E12943C for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id c184so31638146wmd.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:09:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EEFBld2NojvsnXquZwgP8iXfEmV5qdYwl8sJ3Jda/Sg=; b=Ohg9IddulsGSKt3Lbn/jjqE/bE6mBZo7ZOYFno1h8kKdV42463nQ9VvEKCe3xvLOau eq1panVCqEKj3acxKRc0233nXs2CnssZBrrMv6izv+Wr93jA12kk+kVsPXOUIiv74/Yv O8KU9g53kzmzMiPQk/9Dr+DZyYnYNuDCV6dIDsdh36HzHnYH22fx9IJe5hrlX9xP/qzY oceEEgF3SI3SYXgJFdgNwIIY+8wk4R4vne5WbHYHxQNIXFuPuhMCUsJNhgBVso8vmRaJ LpaWXwS3Yw5mbkaz1dGTJ6PZ67S/xvfa8jREoCXlvrQAp3MgMIceg9TwzfVRpy4jQ2h4 JzEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EEFBld2NojvsnXquZwgP8iXfEmV5qdYwl8sJ3Jda/Sg=; b=l9ODOGdsLa5zLS+olRCHpWYLhwYFk7xc/NmxpT0QI38ErtnIRVYB9ZnxDH9kn/h2C+ KioyNo0YoSKJnfmkZzoS2jMrNqJsyVOodhPX3m/k0/KHePW/quQkuMW4hONkP+IPS7ok r8ZQzND2IuFKIPNqK6V3Lp1gvfIHcIXlhCr6pV0fZcRrciOjjad3A0O8tan0+GxKwKDW hfw8BFHkRcTXdfKLIwhc27mZ9dpeT9jxZ1udpO/MOhBS6pBoxOLAwgeGwysk2ViEf8Jl B6gWAOEdBgk3QWStMALgKJGLjegCHMmFnDK5IUOSV9Noy5YerExRhoCRWqGnEUUONyiY WmOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc9GT2DceLX3n9iImmPG1ME2DHbfVyLjWFM3qwvo+CJcabABGI7gQGvyBK8HvYq2TEOt/gIoRzyWTNBeA==
X-Received: by 10.28.213.74 with SMTP id m71mr12639459wmg.39.1478552978968; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:09:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.197.132 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:09:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERkSJ57rvndCOaA+i8RWm_oFVyR6vO7eupY6JHVh9_68Lg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH1iCiq6jNtnkta0Bt952EQ9zOKSGt=_cCySsT5XuOKuHYO2nQ@mail.gmail.com> <86860386-9C2B-4BD5-B457-2A6DA5446CF3@cisco.com> <20161106040849.GB18931@shrubbery.net> <5BD3C90E-CC0E-42D2-9ACD-5787FC75BF0A@cisco.com> <20161106194258.GB5113@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ERnEDrPi4SAR9_R1zmwbYCE9aQEQjZN8tK09Y8csMDchVw@mail.gmail.com> <20161107102306.GV24817@gir.theapt.org> <022901d2391f$928dc660$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <CAH1iCip6ut+C2Hv2FZZ5Bycth+_=smJ_o=_C2LMvBh-fmFgVtg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkSJ57rvndCOaA+i8RWm_oFVyR6vO7eupY6JHVh9_68Lg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 13:09:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CAH1iCio69PytDGJ5JAc3L077Rvue9Mss92cKD+FH9rFLeULfuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1146977017d76d0540bc71eb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/zxUHTp4zZ3MJy2XrRXuPkYxMQG8>
Cc: IETF IDR <idr@ietf.org>, Peter Hessler <phessler@theapt.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 21:09:42 -0000

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:

> Hi Brian,
>
> > Maybe folks from various vendors (including open source implementations)
> > could chime in on the availability of knobs for changing global
> (default)
>
> Maybe we should move this thread to GROW maybe not, but since you started
> the pool here I would add a question to indicate by any implementation that
> if it drops an attribute (as it is not enabled to be sent over a session)
> would it log it in syslog and if so with what error level. The worse
> operationally are silent drops in any control plane.
>
>
>
I would definitely be in favor of including that detail.

Also, I am not aware of whether attribute-sending is flagged in the
capabilities negotiation of an OPEN. That would, IMHO, be a better place to
signal attribute passing vs dropping, rather than on each UPDATE. What do
vendors think of that (or is it already done?)?

Brian