Re: Question about STD format...

"John S. Quarterman" <jsq@mids.org> Fri, 26 April 1996 16:35 UTC

Message-Id: <199604261517.KAA28260@akasha.tic.com>
To: Ryan Moats <jayhawk@ds.internic.net>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "John S. Quarterman" <jsq@mids.org>
Cc: "John S. Quarterman" <jsq@mids.org>
Cc: Joyce Reynolds <jkrey@isi.edu>, uswg@isi.edu
Subject: Re: Question about STD format...
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Apr 96 08:21:06 CDT." <3180CDC2.2343@ds.internic.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 10:17:21 -0500
Precedence: bulk

>Joyce-
>
>Not sure if this is the right place to bring this up, but I think it
>might be so here goes...
>
>We are setting up a couple of Z39.50 1992 databases for things like the
>RFC, FYI, STD series, the internet-drafts, etc.  I have discovered that
>while I-Ds, RFCs, and FYIs have some document identification embedded
>in them, the STDs don't.  The only consistent information is the
>RFC number.  I have gone throguh and embedded the STD number in the 
>header a la the FYI series.  How do I go about getting these out
>to the world?

Since STD numbers refer at different times to different RFCs,
wasn't the plan for STDs to have the current RFC number specified
in a master document, rather than in the current RFC?

Thanks,
John

John S. Quarterman <jsq@mids.org>
Editor, Matrix Maps Quarterly and Matrix News <mids@mids.org>
President, Matrix Information and Directory Services (MIDS)
http://www.mids.org, +1-512-451-7602, fax: +1-512-452-0127
1106 Clayton Lane, Suite 500W
Austin, TX 78723
U.S.A.

Re: Question about STD format... John S. Quarterman
Re: Question about STD format... Ryan Moats