Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] Please review draft-bi-savi-wlan-15

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Sat, 10 November 2018 03:52 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB5D130E07 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 19:52:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s11wpe2MGug4 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 19:52:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EDC6130DD5 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 19:52:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7852; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1541821972; x=1543031572; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=x0j/1r0oeXbFG2eCGeI2JDAXpe5kvY8HwIS7YBQR7pE=; b=jqLJSc5DXL+OP01tg6lxX68zak7SX8Xe5N6fIQ1B/D/2QhAl56lySlq+ nweF02f0MCdzpvCKSu1P0NlvGwLgWAcz8qik8R+/AN4BnGuIdAvRlpMRq b7DGrz/Vtw/UKEnXCcQHvswyqIzL5wmS0e7+rWJZD4nkClS93b8ZmfNGd o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ADAAAPVeZb/4UNJK1jGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ1ILmaBAicKjAaLfIINkWGFVIF6CwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BI4RJAoMkIjQNDQEDAQECAQECbRwMhToBAQEELTsMBRACAQgRBAEBKAcyFAk?= =?us-ascii?q?IAgQBDQUIE4MHgR1kD6hahDEChXgFi3wXgUE/gRGDEoMbAQEDgT4BAVSFJQK?= =?us-ascii?q?JLw6FLlmQCAkChnGKHiCBV4UBiG2BKY0hiikCERSBJh04gVVwFTuCbIschT5?= =?us-ascii?q?BMYpBDRcHgQGBHwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,485,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="477519495"
Received: from alln-core-11.cisco.com ([173.36.13.133]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Nov 2018 03:52:51 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com (xch-rcd-016.cisco.com [173.37.102.26]) by alln-core-11.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id wAA3qpT6004465 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 10 Nov 2018 03:52:51 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-016.cisco.com (173.37.102.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:52:50 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:52:50 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, "ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org" <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
CC: "Jerome Henry (jerhenry)" <jerhenry@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [ieee-ietf-coord] Please review draft-bi-savi-wlan-15
Thread-Index: AQHUeKIDtHKGZjk9EUWWq43H9ReTA6VIXmWA
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 03:52:47 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 03:52:24 +0000
Message-ID: <ee1377bb05f4499a833f687c3f79d072@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <82746879-F964-485B-B8CC-2DB7C37E13D9@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <82746879-F964-485B-B8CC-2DB7C37E13D9@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.75.233.229]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ee1377bb05f4499a833f687c3f79d072XCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.26, xch-rcd-016.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-11.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ieee-ietf-coord/5uFwlgP_lbyduD_gaJ80FgfyQyQ>
Subject: Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] Please review draft-bi-savi-wlan-15
X-BeenThere: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <ieee-ietf-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ieee-ietf-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 03:52:55 -0000

Hello Russ

This is all related to the discussion on rfc-to-be 8505. The SAVI draft represents a personal view of what we have to do when RFC 8505 does not exist; as an implementer of it I can tell you that a very close form of that really exists in the products and is what allows us today to scale wireless in conferences the size of this one. OTOH, snooping fails to provide a complete and accurate views of the network and there are tons of tricks to cope with that beyond what the naïve non-implementer could guess. Those hidden operations may very well contradict future changes in the official standards, so there is a hidden mine in all this game. The 802.11 model of an association is a lot preferable to snooping. RFC 8505 will be that association at layer 3.

All the best,

Pascal

From: ieee-ietf-coord <ieee-ietf-coord-bounces@ietf.org>; On Behalf Of Russ Housley
Sent: samedi 10 novembre 2018 10:04
To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
Subject: [ieee-ietf-coord] Please review draft-bi-savi-wlan-15

Suresh reports that he has received a request to publish https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bi-savi-wlan-15

It involves a source address validation solution for WLAN.

A review from Bernard Aboba brought up some issues that may be of relevance to 802.11. At this stage, comments should be sent to the IETF mail list (ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>).