[ieee-ietf-coord] iot.schema.org

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 09 September 2016 08:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B5012B140 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 01:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0zWOmOFSWGZ2 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 01:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BA5012B13D for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 01:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id s131so121729542oie.2 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 01:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sZS33hPyUyTFfqYLnyklnNhM3EwTbKLIxNuQrQcvgUw=; b=OmJwNmiUv9ZZBr73VO+/NwnaZYx11HICgXOPoN9ivtyTvPujEJ/O0fdJiGUHSbYMCd uzDZoVRwE6qeJ3eZ2isdKBWqmXx8DZwWbeLlUd/YJr0FijWOolVFlTXJC84F0rDfdhqn cLWdN6vGfLJn4nK/UY04VYnE6znap0P/OgTDT64+8kcngp6P7DWBEMTnk9ytYsF4RHN2 OWuu+BKOXRiz7GpfMdgDtJfoEAZCQsuaZ8Jt+PmzWV8BgJsGKZLlw9BVCDuX5yoydcui tic5WnwxtsoRdrc1H4U37X2yD4ZN6/To43saDD8JYv5jwlocrBRWTh7bwVcNt1PM1sEI T4Cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=sZS33hPyUyTFfqYLnyklnNhM3EwTbKLIxNuQrQcvgUw=; b=RwhO3NGOf/ZElIHg5kQmzvjjJ1FO0HxwIekQyAlRjB6xFR9VAxdUUyTwSEwAB91BP+ HTCMnyafxZXSKfHa9cG9XFxTIG/4iKNGoj60cLhalBzrFG0H3FkK6dFZ7w768i8kSxNw Xr59kVg383Tbvztc1DT7Z0x2Qbn3WnRqOAlQDaRAHeUYC1afdmFqIDRAy03HgnhvCSTm Hx/dsUWig3QzRICLlTeqQfoQiuhGrOMHtI90g2P7xsfHE3ntIrjF31tgWrCiuHMi1P8B Gqbu7pFaen3ePWxHiar6xswIp8JQorLPiMeerL4Rq4VFZfoi3wyXPOZ5QJIhSDLCFi5S KEUg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNrH2YGxtIhCoiU6NXBCjm22ZQCKv5QwVtFs+XyEBXFBZ0VLzRlulmQZd32u3j6Mb9YE+iZSxA3O5/S/w==
X-Received: by 10.157.20.101 with SMTP id h92mr586864oth.186.1473409959296; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 01:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.79.78 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 01:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 10:32:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCAwF6bpH1uVb_-JOzFN22A21S7wA7-dYXSM4zmj5UbSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1149e4523b83e8053c0efd48"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ieee-ietf-coord/BBrjn5i1COm8-dC-AceT_TXo37A>
Subject: [ieee-ietf-coord] iot.schema.org
X-BeenThere: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <ieee-ietf-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ieee-ietf-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:32:44 -0000

Howdy,

The mailing list I mentioned in this morning's discussion for IoT
schema-related work is https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sdo-iot-sync.
It has a short intro of:

"The list is open to all parties interested in exploring the use and
extension of schema.org schemas for semantic interoperability with IoT.

See also https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1272 "

I'm happy to discuss this further with folks, but Dan Brickley, cc'ed on
this message is the person for the full skinny,

best,

Ted