Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] draft-richardson-anima-ipv6-lldp

Paul Congdon <> Thu, 09 April 2020 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A6F3A0ED3 for <>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.118
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.118 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jekrDKdFca2s for <>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6259D3A0F7F for <>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id m67so5206603qke.12 for <>; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lnX8lm4oyfYoDP5WeJFcZbMxGqgx6UOfzdiarXIAC+M=; b=lucYJYtsa+x3QQpIIEH6IZHNlRAcbcG8Lk0JTtqphacFvhpgjq9IiQCDAZOCw+Z2qK 3YVHEu8x2n/aYaR01+kb2U0poPqmBAhu3nK+n/UAgGuj48vhX7JyDku94LRs33b59+M/ J6yPR7UJ1nY/9ZzUDtuATvbz0EF6weqHYl4e0HWDqyD7Q43fY4YOnWHGFas9wrXrFEVr Xng2Ipy/Hui79tee5xHtkBpXU/9ytZAn0zK1cgniaKs9wQN1yztSUdGpkHvWZgJKJ/4X P+W1rZOgFQpyed7nBHYjdA+BUjY2LV9FVcBkuUWDem2vgQGaSaVcBegxbcTfP2r0CiSM BNrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lnX8lm4oyfYoDP5WeJFcZbMxGqgx6UOfzdiarXIAC+M=; b=otcISrQSt+GZwViRHPOXVNeRxVfhocc15ore/b6rPX6nUVm1pQzXokYVOiW5MVEHHj WXe5qGFcNVfh4sd6mUBkWA5YQUDbH5/FFgMbz9jJGHA6JddfT9nixs2oSVmvWjsl26yY QECNnu+ksW8hdsw5LRnJ695OeTSCx0op9vFl3wZvwcc77Kigll9x4PrhD9eAFoSo+ATU u9QunZw4T8K/Vd4wCqrG7NzDhiq9vJhdOsyBJfSDafw8mNSNRMoSMzzeqXA+TrmN7PIC Lo86y9gmc+4Zcu5sRlo3wrD+/k9znGpoPlUZjZtXZHfX0aKEX4m+pOzZwBQj+PIFmnKc e8vA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZSFzAXAEAaGJ6AaEL/PPq7GsX1NmGiIb+tS7h3BTrQ5ygJPVAj +47kX/q50tSAE7Hfrb8HJ7kR1MgwxfszqXWELxJI6SuGfJE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJJKOBqACqkDaioThsy5FhNvoeipSFIpsDo/omfk1lzdH5lDV3+6P3/C1oPPthvnroGqZW0Dv4ndUOtpNC13n0=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6289:: with SMTP id w131mr415320qkb.371.1586460253341; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Paul Congdon <>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 12:24:01 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: Russ Housley <>
Cc: "<>" <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d9e01005a2e08fc8"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] draft-richardson-anima-ipv6-lldp
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 19:25:03 -0000

I've had a brief look at this draft.   My personal belief is that this is a
gross miss-use of the LLDP protocol.  LLDP is NOT a general L2 transport
protocol.   It is intended to exchange a 'relatively' static local database
with neighbors.   When an LLDP agent receives a frame, it is supposed to
compare what it received with what it received the last time and if
anything is different, it will throw away all of the previous information,
replace the database with the most recently received information and
'wake-up' the higher layers to process the changes.  The expectation (and
design center for the protocol) is that things do NOT change frequently.
Assuming the IPv6 packets are intending to implement their own protocol and
will be changing frequently, encapsulating an IPv6 packet inside an LLDP
TLV would signal a change on each transmission and possibly cause an SNMP
TRAP on each packet received by a traditional implementation.   If I
understand the use case correctly, the draft is seriously miss-using the
protocol and I believe others within 802.1 would agree with me.


On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:47 AM Russ Housley <> wrote:

> There was a discussion of draft-richardson-anima-ipv6-lldp on the ANIMA WG
> virtual interim meeting earlier today.  It would be great if someone
> familiar with LLDP could take a look at the Internet-Draft and let the
> group know if there is a better way to proceed.
> Russ
> _______________________________________________
> ieee-ietf-coord mailing list