Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] RFC8691 and 802.11bd

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 19 October 2021 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B36A3A0878 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 06:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LpmI_dE0G_Bj for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 06:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DE4B3A0873 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 06:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 19JDomGD028575 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:50:48 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 66C1020590F for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:50:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D060205835 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:50:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 19JDom9l026083 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:50:48 +0200
To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
References: <22460712-eacf-8b13-dd65-4347801fc348@gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <84ba94ac-2575-376a-37c2-52fb23dff289@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 15:50:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <22460712-eacf-8b13-dd65-4347801fc348@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ieee-ietf-coord/m2MYVLxygGsObD8PcdX6c6lEJLA>
Subject: Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] RFC8691 and 802.11bd
X-BeenThere: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <ieee-ietf-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ieee-ietf-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2021 13:50:56 -0000

Does the 802.11bd D2.0 of July 2021 mention 'IPv6'?

Alex

Le 15/07/2021 à 21:24, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
> Hi, participants to the IEEE-IETF coordination,
> 
> RFC8691 "IPv6 over OCB" is produced by the IPWAVE WG of IETF.  It 
> describes the layering of the IPv6 network protocol on top of the 802.11 
> MAC in OCB mode.  This mode is the preferred mode of operation for 
> automobile networks that involve 802.11.  This OCB mode is also known as 
> 802.11p, and will be used in the future 802.11bd to be released by IEEE 
> in 2022.
> 
> I would like to say that it will be a great idea if the 802.11bd 
> document cited RFC8691 whenever the former said 'IPv6'.  It would be a 
> perfect match.
> 
> How to achieve that goal?
> 
> I think there might be a few hurdles in achieving it:
> 
> - I do not have regular access to the 802.11bd ongoing developments, and 
> the latest documents.  I am not a member of the IEEE respective group.
> 
> - some IEEE people often think that _if_ there is a network layer in 
> automobile networks, then that would first be the IEEE's networking 
> layer for it, which is IEEE 1609.3, and 'WSMP', which is a different 
> thing than the IP networking layer.  It might be that IEEE gives 
> preference to that networking layer instead of IP.
> 
>  From an architecture point of view, I think there is no comparison to 
> be made between those two networking layers.  The IP networking layer 
> clearly has several advantages, scuh as its addressability capacity and 
> the forwarding of datagrams for scalability.
> 
>  From an implementation point of view, I did see many implementations of 
> this IPv6-over-OCB (802.11p) running in many automobile networks. An 
> implementation of IPv6-over-OCB of 802.11bd is only around the corner, 
> not posing any significant challenge in realization.
> 
> Maybe these worries are not really founded, and maybe it is extremely 
> easy to cite RFC8691 in 802.11bd.  But how to do it?
> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ieee-ietf-coord mailing list
> ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord
>