Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] Augmentation of ieee802-dot1q-bridge (draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang)

ROBERT GROW <bobgrow@cox.net> Wed, 08 April 2020 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bobgrow@cox.net>
X-Original-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02D13A19BC for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 16:25:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zB0dM-0--uRy for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 16:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta012.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net (omta012.uswest2.a.cloudfilter.net [35.164.127.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16FBD3A19BB for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 16:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cxr.smtp.a.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.16.208]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id MEPNjQLQlmUuyMK47jJ8Qk; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 23:25:03 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([72.199.120.20]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPSA id MK43j2Ax7BLQiMK45jAxAA; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 23:25:03 +0000
Authentication-Results: cox.net; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=bobgrow@cox.net
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=eNJtc0h1 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=muFRQQPKe3JH4BpxLpeSYA==:117 a=muFRQQPKe3JH4BpxLpeSYA==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=HLvPDLHGFjgA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=XYmi4KM01EUG2MVREgAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=-RoEEKskQ1sA:10 a=uZWTVQnaGC1JV7jA63EA:9 a=MVaoI07jRpgpcmms:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
From: ROBERT GROW <bobgrow@cox.net>
Message-Id: <0CABE8C1-86F8-4E6B-8DCD-7CF28E9C7FBA@cox.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E4F8ED65-4AA9-49C4-A94C-E3F13757ABEC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 16:24:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsyKhw5XKjDJiQVzp4QVjzR76EQrfz8Y6z3-Rt3k+XMOog@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "<ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>" <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAMMESsyKhw5XKjDJiQVzp4QVjzR76EQrfz8Y6z3-Rt3k+XMOog@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPNFa3kj98xX0JQ5gxTbgj0RtBE+eOLYGA+obl74/T+AHMQZpR99XCR1WMC9gTQOStAPgAOHy6FFvyaVIkVAKqcFOpwOI+llrDJwI/OlE7QqnIaVPqYk OHdVjOwuvbzYE+Pna2YuyJyhRWcjlG2AEFMGpSzHgCO7aNoKUIqKrfSQnbAvwIHwgY4xs1to/XFZExBTbpVNAs0vwg8FOtgIILE=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ieee-ietf-coord/uDSkRT7jlVdYU_P3XfjeHP-mzbM>
Subject: Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] Augmentation of ieee802-dot1q-bridge (draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang)
X-BeenThere: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <ieee-ietf-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ieee-ietf-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 23:25:06 -0000

Alvaro:

The management arcs to be used certainly has to be understood.  If the urn arcs use the ieee root we definitely need additional coordination both with any IEEE subgroups included in the urn and I expect the RAC will be interested also.

—Bob Grow

> On Apr 8, 2020, at 3:33 PM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Mostly FYI…
> 
> 
> The pim WG has been working on a YANG model to configure and manage IGMP/MLD snooping devices [1].  The draft has passed WGLC and has been sent to the IESG for publication — I am the responsible AD and we’re waiting for the authors to address my comments before moving into IESG Evaluation.
> 
> The new module (ietf-igmp-mld-snooping) augments ieee802-dot1q-bridge to enable snooping on a bridge, or a specific VLAN.
> 
> 
> This is the first YANG module that I process which augments an IEEE module, so I’m sending this note just in case there’s some type of additional coordination needed.  Please let me know.
> 
> Thanks!!
> 
> Alvaro.
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-snooping-yang/> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ieee-ietf-coord mailing list
> ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>