[Ieprep] Fw: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Thu, 02 November 2006 21:51 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfkSv-0007Jk-5i; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:51:13 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfkSt-0007FL-Pc for ieprep@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:51:11 -0500
Received: from amer-mta08.csc.com ([20.137.52.152]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GfkSs-0002Zd-GZ for ieprep@ietf.org; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:51:11 -0500
Received: from amer-gw09.amer.csc.com (amer-gw09.amer.csc.com [20.6.39.245]) by amer-mta08.csc.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id kA2Lp8Vk018999 for <ieprep@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:51:08 -0500 (EST)
To: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes 652HF83 November 04, 2004
Message-ID: <OFD6644434.A1477E94-ON8525721A.0077F4E9-8525721A.00780852@csc.com>
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:51:04 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 11/02/2006 04:50:01 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c3a18ef96977fc9bcc21a621cbf1174b
Subject: [Ieprep] Fw: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
----- Forwarded by Janet P Gunn/FED/CSC on 11/02/2006 04:50 PM ----- Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote on 11/02/2006 02:45:16 PM: > >>>>> "ken" == ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk> writes: > > ken> Sam, One of the objectives of the work produced by IEPREP was > ken> to lay down the ground work and put together a baseline set > ken> of requirements to start with when considering solutions. > ken> Our intention was that the baseline then becomes a starting > ken> point where more specific requirements can be put forth. > ken> Outside of this, solutions were definitely out of scope. > > ken> My understanding is that there are others that now wish to > ken> present some more specific requirements and potential > ken> solutions that do not fall into the scope of other working > ken> groups. So the proposed re-charter looks to be a natural > ken> extension to what has been done. > > ken> Interestingly enough, the work that you mention below in your > ken> original posting... > ken> ... rfc-4542, rfc-4411, and draft > ken> -ietf-tsvwg-vpn-signal-preemption (along with some other > ken> related work) has actually not been done in IEPREP because > ken> the group was not allowed to consider solutions. Instead, > ken> some of the work has been pushed to TSVWG, to the groans and > ken> sometimes confusion of some of the participants of that > ken> group, who wondered what the subject of prioritization had to > ken> do with TSVWG. Part > > I think the work you cite belongs in tsvwg. AT least 4542 and > vpn-signaling-preemption. > > ken> of the revised charter is meant to > ken> remove this obstacle. > > Which work would be permitted under the revised charter that is > currently udone elsewhere? I may have more concerns about the revised > charter than I thought I did. > > ken> Also, as Scott Brimm has mentioned, there is a proposed > ken> liaison from the ITU to work with the IETF, with one of the > ken> working groups of interest being IEPREP. It would seem > ken> odd to close down the group and punt the subject to them when > ken> they are approaching "us" for assistance If IEPREP is > ken> closed, does that mean the subject gets pushed over to TSVWG? > > > that rather depends on what question they're asking, now doesn't it? > IF they're asking for enhancements to RSVP to deal with some ETS > issues, then yes, I'd hope the work would be done in tsvwg. That way, > ETS requirements can be balanced against other requirements. If they > want to change SIP, I'd hope that it would go through sipping and > eventually sip. > > > If they want us to do non-protocol work closer to 4542, then perhaps > we need a WG to do it in. > > --Sam > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ieprep mailing list Ieprep@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep
- [Ieprep] WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergen… IESG Secretary
- [Ieprep] WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergen… James M. Polk
- [Ieprep] Fwd: Re: WG Review: Recharter of Interne… James M. Polk
- [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… James M. Polk
- [Ieprep] Fw: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… Janet P Gunn
- [Ieprep] Fw: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… Janet P Gunn
- [Ieprep] Fw: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… Janet P Gunn
- [Ieprep] Fw: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… Janet P Gunn
- [Ieprep] Fw: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… Janet P Gunn
- [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Robert G. Cole
- [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… ken carlberg
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Janet P Gunn
- [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… Janet P Gunn
- [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Robert G. Cole
- [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… Fred Baker
- [Ieprep] RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Eme… Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Janet P Gunn
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Curtis Villamizar
- RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet… Fred Baker