[Ieprep] on the ieprep charter
"Robert G. Cole" <robert.cole@jhuapl.edu> Wed, 12 July 2006 12:53 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G0eDc-0002mO-7x; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:53:32 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G0eDa-0002mI-J0 for ieprep@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:53:30 -0400
Received: from aplesnation.dom1.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.195]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G0eDX-0006mU-Ae for ieprep@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:53:30 -0400
Received: from jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.200]) by aplesnation.dom1.jhuapl.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:53:26 -0400
Received: from ([128.244.97.125]) by pilot.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id 5502123.1430109; Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:53:17 -0400
Message-ID: <44B4F17B.70105@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 08:56:27 -0400
From: "Robert G. Cole" <robert.cole@jhuapl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ieprep@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jul 2006 12:53:26.0919 (UTC) FILETIME=[2AE72170:01C6A5B2]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Subject: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
Kimberly, I am not sure of the lastest revision to the charter, so will make a few general comments on various versions and discussions. I am also curious of the target date for completing the charter revision. + I agree with expanding the scope of the WG away from solely an emergency Telecomm focus to a more general emergency communications focus. I do not think a totally military focus is correct however; this is only one of several sectors the IETF needs to address. There is significant overlap in the needs for emergency services within Enterprise, Public and Military networks, that to focus on a single sector would represent a disservice to all of these communities. + I agree with the suggestion to expand beyond requirements and informational to standard track RFCs, if necessary. There are clearly gaps in the current set of standards within the scope of emergency services. That being said, I have a few specific comments: + I would shy away from the term 'Telecommunications' and use 'Communications' when refering to working group scope. Using it as an example is fine. + I generally prefer to use the term 'Precedence' in place of 'Prioritization' when refering to general capabilities and requirements. Prioritization implies (to some) a (queuing)mechanism, which may not be required in many instances. + A 'Feb 07 draft on mechanisms' is suggested. Is this to focus on transport service mechanisms and/or application level mechanisms? + Perhaps the WG should consider drafting an I-D on Application Considerations when accessing emergency transport services. I know there has been some discussion of Email/SMTP in this group. Should the charter make discussion of application considerations in scope? I think yes. I think such a document would point out some interesting interactions required between the network and the applications, e.g., access control, multiplexing, etc. Thanks, Bob _______________________________________________ Ieprep mailing list Ieprep@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep
- [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter Robert G. Cole
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter Robert G. Cole
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter Robert G. Cole
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter Howard C. Berkowitz
- RE: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter (UNCLASSIFIED) Nguyen, An P CIV NCS NC2
- RE: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter (UNCLASSIFIED) Howard C. Berkowitz
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter Fred Baker
- RE: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter (UNCLASSIFIED) Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter ken carlberg
- [Ieprep] Question about the IEPREP Recharting Pro… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter Rex Buddenberg
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] on the ieprep charter ken carlberg
- Re: [Ieprep] Question about the IEPREP Recharting… ken carlberg
- Re: [Ieprep] Question about the IEPREP Recharting… Hannes Tschofenig