Re: [Ieprep] IEPREP working group

ken carlberg <> Mon, 18 September 2006 15:48 UTC

Received: from [] ( by with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPLM6-0005La-GV; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:48:22 -0400
Received: from [] ( by with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPLM5-0005LK-Sc; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:48:21 -0400
Received: from ([]) by with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPLM2-000118-EU; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:48:21 -0400
Received: from [] (helo=[]) by with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <>) id 1GPLLs-0008KY-QM; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:48:15 +0100
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: ken carlberg <>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] IEPREP working group
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:48:01 -0400
To: IESG <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>


I'm at a loss as to why there is still no response of *any kind*  
regarding the status of the IEPREP WG and its proposed revised  
charter.  I and others have sent private email regarding this matter  
in the past couple of months with no response, and the email (below)  
sent to a more public forum has also generated _no_ response.  (and  
please keep in mind, I'm talking about a response as opposed to an  

The posted past minutes of the IESG teleconferences shows that IEPREP  
has not been discussed.  And I look at the proposed agenda for the  
next teleconference and see that IEPREP is not listed under Section  
4.2 WG Rechartering, and it lists "None".

I don't understand the situation as it stands and would appreciate  
ANY comment.

Only slightly in jest, I'm beginning to wonder if one needs to break  
new ground and post an appeal to the IAB for a lack of comment :-)


On Sep 11, 2006, at 3:35 PM, ken carlberg wrote:

> Hello,
> I would appreciate it if someone on the IESG could make a statement  
> on the status of the IEPREP working group.
> Back in June, a strawman re-charter proposal was floated on the  
> IEPREP list, and a number of comments, both public and private,  
> ensued up to the August Montreal meeting.  And its my understanding  
> that the WG was discussed by the IESG at that point.  However, the  
> group has not received any official feedback or comments from the  
> powers that be.
> Now, I appreciate the need for private discussions and the  
> headaches in coordinating comments of numerous individuals --  
> hearding cats is probably an easier feat to accomplish.  But at  
> some point, decisions need to be made and at a minimum, feedback  
> needs to filter down to the interested parties.....even if the  
> comment is "....we are still discussing the issues, and this is  
> what is holding up our decision.....yadda, yadda, yadda".
> I do not wish to embarrass anyone or set of people.  And perhaps  
> the topic of IEPREP simply fell through the cracks, but I would  
> really appreciate it if someone could step up and inform the IEPREP  
> participants of *something*.
> kindest regards,
> -ken
> _______________________________________________
> Ieprep mailing list

Ieprep mailing list