Re: RESEND RE: [Ieprep] Another version of a potential IEPREP charter (UNCLASSIFIED)
Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Fri, 07 July 2006 21:58 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyyLG-0000q6-HL; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:58:30 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyyLF-0000pn-89 for ieprep@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:58:29 -0400
Received: from amer-mta07.csc.com ([20.137.52.151]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyyLD-0005GT-Vz for ieprep@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:58:29 -0400
Received: from amer-gw09.csc.com (amer-gw09.csc.com [20.6.39.245]) by amer-mta07.csc.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k67LwNsW015590; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 17:58:23 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <9B4320CC9BC1D847AFFA97F25A422A590C6D09@vanualevu.disanet.disa-u.mil>
Subject: Re: RESEND RE: [Ieprep] Another version of a potential IEPREP charter (UNCLASSIFIED)
To: "Perschau, Stephen CIV NCS NC2" <stephen.perschau@dhs.gov>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes 652HF83 November 04, 2004
Message-ID: <OFBF61A5EA.3CFBCEB8-ON852571A4.0078559F-852571A4.0078B1B3@csc.com>
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:58:17 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 07/07/2006 05:57:16 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7fa173a723009a6ca8ce575a65a5d813
Cc: ieprep@ietf.org, ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
My comments on the first part. * on the lines I changed Thanks, Janet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Perschau, Stephen CIV NCS NC2" <stephen.perschau@dhs.gov> wrote on 07/07/2006 01:29:37 PM: > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > Sorry for having to resend this but the text deletions/modifications in > Ken's proposed text did not go through as highlighted. Ignore the > previous email. > > Stephen Perschau > > -----Original Message----- > From: Perschau, Stephen CIV NCS NC2 > Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 1:05 PM > To: ken carlberg > Cc: ieprep@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Ieprep] Another version of a potential IEPREP charter > (UNCLASSIFIED) > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > Essentially accept Ken's proposal with some modifications. Still do not > like the text that Ken didn't modify so my suggested changes are > provided. Hopefully the strikeouts and additions are visible. This > proposed text brings the charter in line with the deliverables and makes > it clear that the focus is on MLPP for managed IP networks and public > networks where permissible by regulations/law. > > Stephen Perschau > > > > <Text Proposed By > Carlberg>--------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------------------------ > > Internet Prioritization and Preparedness (IEPREP) Charter > *> Prioritization involves identifying communications that have authorized access to preferential treatment. > Communities of interest have viewed prioritization as one step in > facilitating response and recovery operations during emergencies/ *> disasters, or in other occasions where ordinary communications are likely to fail *> and a particular sets of authorized users (e.g., first responders, chain of command *> have a need to obtain a service that might not otherwise be available. *> These circumstance may involve communications over the Internet or private IP > networks/intranets. > *Delete> Natural disasters (e.g., hurricanes, floods, earthquakes) and those *Delete> created by man (e.g., terrorist attacks, wartime events) may occur at *Delete> any time. *> These users require > immediate access to available telecommunications resources. These > resource include not only: conventional telephone, cellular phones, and > Internet access via online terminals, IP telephones, and wireless PDAs > but also access to available network resources (e.g., bandwidth). *> Both the commercial telecommunications infrastructure and private/enterprise/military *> telecommunications infrastructures are rapidly evolving to *> Internet-based technology. The Internet community needs to consider how > its protocols can support prioritized communications in these contexts. > *> There are different ways to provide prioritization: (1) in some contexts traffic > engineering or schemas that improve the probability of *> establishing/maintaining communications during times of stress are appropriate, (2) in other contexts a > more binary approach of displacing or preempting lower priority *> communications is appropriate. > > > <Text Proposed by > Carlberg>--------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------------------- _______________________________________________ Ieprep mailing list Ieprep@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep
- [Ieprep] Another version of a potential IEPREP ch… King, Kimberly S.
- Re: [Ieprep] Another version of a potential IEPRE… James M. Polk
- RE: [Ieprep] Another version of a potential IEPRE… GOLDMAN, STUART O (STUART)
- Re: [Ieprep] Another version of a potential IEPRE… ken carlberg
- RE: [Ieprep] Another version of a potential IEPRE… Perschau, Stephen CIV NCS NC2
- RESEND RE: [Ieprep] Another version of a potentia… Perschau, Stephen CIV NCS NC2
- Re: RESEND RE: [Ieprep] Another version of a pote… Janet P Gunn