Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter

Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Wed, 27 September 2006 19:11 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSeoW-0005Bl-F4; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSeoW-0005BM-0N for ieprep@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:24 -0400
Received: from amer-mta07.csc.com ([20.137.52.151]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSeoQ-0008OC-46 for ieprep@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:23 -0400
Received: from amer-gw09.csc.com (amer-gw09.csc.com [20.6.39.245]) by amer-mta07.csc.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k8RJB6U0005590; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:11:15 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <08357DDC-1E93-4DC8-83C8-AC75D11FCB63@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes 652HF83 November 04, 2004
Message-ID: <OF224B2CE0.98EC02F1-ON852571F6.0068F50B-852571F6.00693082@csc.com>
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:10:03 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 09/27/2006 03:10:03 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Cc: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>, ieprep@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org




My understanding (and Martin et al can correct me/clarify):

Current discussion is about voice.
Video conferencing is actively under consideration
Elastic traffic is a long term goal, but not currently being addressed in
any detail.

Janet


Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> wrote on 09/27/2006 03:05:19 PM:

>
> On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:44 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>
> > Just confirming that Fred considers ETS to be voice only - at least
> > for now.  btw - I think that is a valid assumption - at least for now.
>
> depends on which "ETS" you're talking about. In the military space,
> current proposals suggest at least one "preferred elastic" class
> similar to AF for elastic applications as well as preferential real
> time services for voice and video. In the civilian space, unless
> Janet-et-al tell me otherwise, the current discussion is of an
> Internet counterpart for GETS, which is to say that it is about voice.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ieprep mailing list
> Ieprep@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep


_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
Ieprep@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep