Re: [Ieprep] IEPREP working group

"Robert G. Cole" <robert.cole@jhuapl.edu> Tue, 12 September 2006 16:47 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNBPf-0003AC-Lj; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:47:07 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNBPf-00039G-17; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:47:07 -0400
Received: from pilot.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.200] helo=jhuapl.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNBPd-00088h-Ab; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:47:07 -0400
Received: from ([128.244.246.166]) by pilot.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id 5502123.5685046; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:46:35 -0400
Message-ID: <4506E60E.8040907@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:53:34 -0400
From: "Robert G. Cole" <robert.cole@jhuapl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] IEPREP working group
References: <E9B3968D-37E5-4D84-ABA9-3B180FC950B3@g11.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <E9B3968D-37E5-4D84-ABA9-3B180FC950B3@g11.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ieprep@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org

I would like to second Ken's request.  We have been patiently waiting 
for quite a while for any kind of status information.

Thanks,
Bob

ken carlberg wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I would appreciate it if someone on the IESG could make a statement  on 
> the status of the IEPREP working group.
> 
> Back in June, a strawman re-charter proposal was floated on the  IEPREP 
> list, and a number of comments, both public and private,  ensued up to 
> the August Montreal meeting.  And its my understanding  that the WG was 
> discussed by the IESG at that point.  However, the  group has not 
> received any official feedback or comments from the  powers that be.
> 
> Now, I appreciate the need for private discussions and the headaches  in 
> coordinating comments of numerous individuals -- hearding cats is  
> probably an easier feat to accomplish.  But at some point, decisions  
> need to be made and at a minimum, feedback needs to filter down to  the 
> interested parties.....even if the comment is "....we are still  
> discussing the issues, and this is what is holding up our  
> decision.....yadda, yadda, yadda".
> 
> I do not wish to embarrass anyone or set of people.  And perhaps the  
> topic of IEPREP simply fell through the cracks, but I would really  
> appreciate it if someone could step up and inform the IEPREP  
> participants of *something*.
> 
> kindest regards,
> 
> -ken
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ieprep mailing list
> Ieprep@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep

_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
Ieprep@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep