Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [Sessions?]

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Tue, 05 July 2005 22:40 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA11047 for <ieprep-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:40:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DpwII-0002KA-Re for ieprep-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:53:35 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dpvpr-0002as-Lb; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:24:11 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dpvpo-0002Zp-Sm for ieprep@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:24:09 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA08820 for <ieprep@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 18:24:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Dpw8W-00084B-5x for ieprep@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:43:28 -0400
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jul 2005 15:15:33 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j65MF46x028334; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:15:25 -0700
Received: from jmpolk-wxp.cisco.com ([10.21.120.51]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:15:24 -0700
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20050705170848.03b43730@email.cisco.com>
X-Sender: jmpolk@email.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 17:15:22 -0500
To: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>, "King, Kimberly S." <KIMBERLY.S.KING@saic.com>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [Sessions?]
In-Reply-To: <42C40623.7010303@cs.columbia.edu>
References: <D24D16A6707B0A4B9EF084299CE99B3922A82DF3@mcl-its-exs02.mail.saic.com> <D24D16A6707B0A4B9EF084299CE99B3922A82DF3@mcl-its-exs02.mail.saic.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jul 2005 22:15:24.0431 (UTC) FILETIME=[0A7029F0:01C581AF]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465
Cc: "Ieprep (ieprep@ietf.org)" <ieprep@ietf.org>, sob@harvard.edu, "Jon Peterson (jon.peterson@neustar.biz)" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3e15cc4fdc61d7bce84032741d11c8e5

Henning

At 10:48 AM 6/30/2005 -0400, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
>Brief remark: I'm not sure what "sessions" refers to in the snippet below. 
>Is this addressed to the application layer session (say, SIP), a network 
>layer session (RSVP, NSIS) or something else entirely?

I believe this needs to be defined, but is loosely the combination of the 
two since a SIP session can be a call, and a reserved flow can be a call, 
and the combination can be a call. If you only use something like SIP, that 
a SIP session is the definition.

IEPREP isn't likely going to only use RSVP or NSIS for flows, but either in 
combination with something like SIP.


>In general, given the tortuous history of IEPREP discussions, more 
>specificity as to the types of mechanisms and protocols affected would be 
>helpful, in my opinion.

"more specificity" would entail a deep analysis of the problem space - 
which the first 3 new deliverables will cover. You are asking for an ID to 
be written to justify the recharter?

>Are there existing drafts that will be used as baseline (or input)

draft-ietf-tsvwg-mlpp-that-works is mention is this new charter

>or this is a from-scratch effort?
>
>King, Kimberly S. wrote:
>
>>3. Some countries require civil networks to preempt sessions under state 
>>circumstances, and preemption is considered an absolute requirement in 
>>governmental networks in most countries. Unless implementation of these 
>>requirements can be objectively shown to threaten network health (via 
>>simulation or in operations), then the requirement needs to be considered 
>>by IEPREP and specific solutions must be developed.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ieprep mailing list
>Ieprep@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep


cheers,
James

                                 *******************
                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented.

_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
Ieprep@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep