Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter?
Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Tue, 05 July 2005 13:18 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA14319 for <ieprep-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 09:18:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Dpnkp-0003b3-Fj for ieprep-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:46:28 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DpnIc-0005gX-5b; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:17:18 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DpnI8-0005YP-U2 for ieprep@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:16:49 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA13167 for <ieprep@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 09:16:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from amer-mta02.csc.com ([20.137.2.248]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Dpnip-0002kD-Nk for ieprep@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:44:25 -0400
Received: from amer-gw09.csc.com (amer-gw09.csc.com [20.6.39.245]) by amer-mta02.csc.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.6) with ESMTP id j65DGYGd019590 for <ieprep@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 09:16:35 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <OF162588F5.55F41921-ON85257031.006CE6ED-85257031.006E31C5@LocalDomain>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter?
To: "Ieprep (ieprep@ietf.org)" <ieprep@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes 652HF83 November 04, 2004
Message-ID: <OF8EA71D55.CC90B10B-ON85257035.004774A8-85257035.0048ED1B@csc.com>
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 09:14:43 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 07/05/2005 09:16:17 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0061139100=="
Sender: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Apparently some people received a mangled version of this, so I am resending it at Scott's request (Scott, let me know if this fixed it) J. I have a generic, high level comment. If we are extending the charter from “requirements only” to “requirements and solutions where not covered elsewhere”, I think the solution space should include solutions for “the evolution of GETS/WPS to IP” as well as solutions for “the evolution of MLPP to IP”. Similarly, the requirements and frameworks that have been previously produced cover the entire IEPREP scope, both "sort of like MLPP" and "sort of like GETS". So I think it would be appropriate to have deliverables such as "Emergency Threats Analysis for Commercial/Public Networks" "Requirements for Emergency Preparedness in Commercial/Public Networks" "Potential Solutions for Commercial/Public Networks" "Mechanisms to be Used by Commercial/Public Networks" as well as the ones proposed for "Government/Military Networks". I think that would be more useful than "Differences between GETS and MLPP networks", especially since some of the differences which are significant in the circuit switched world may be less significant in the packet switched world. But maybe if I saw an abstract of what was intended for the document, I would change my mind. Janet ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Ieprep mailing list Ieprep@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep
- [Ieprep] Re-charter? King, Kimberly S.
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter?time slot? Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Jason Michael Canon
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Jason Michael Canon
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Steve Silverman
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Janet P Gunn
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Bose, Pratik
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [Sessions?] James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [solutions already?] James M. Polk
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [MLPP limited to private… James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [IP911 and preemption] James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [MLPP limited to private… Janet Gunn
- [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Ken Carlberg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? James M. Polk
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? King, Kimberly S.