[Ieprep] RE: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)

Pekka,

At least two carriers, AT&T and Verizon support, "An EF DSCP for
Capacity-Admitted Traffic", Fred Baker, 6-Oct-06

Martin  

-----Original Message-----
From: Pekka Savola [mailto:pekkas@netcore.fi] 
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 2:32 AM
To: Fred Baker
Cc: Sam Hartman; ietf@ietf.org; ieprep@ietf.org; Scott Bradner
Subject: Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness
(ieprep)

On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Fred Baker wrote:
> We also specifically addressed their requirements (in tsvwg)
operationally:
> 
> >http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4594.txt
> >4594 Configuration Guidelines for DiffServ Service Classes. J.
> >     Babiarz, K. Chan, F. Baker. August 2006. (Format: TXT=144044
bytes)
> >     (Status: INFORMATIONAL)
> >
> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr
> >  "Aggregation of DiffServ Service Classes", Kwok Ho Chan, 22-Oct-06
> >and
> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-tsvwg-admitted-voice-dscp
> >  "An EF DSCP for Capacity-Admitted Traffic", Fred Baker, 6-Oct-06
> 
> The last two are in last call and in discussion in tsvwg respectively.

All of these documents are, or are aimed at Informational.  I do not 
see how those could define DSCP codepoints or behaviour -- doing so 
requires Standards Action and certain codepoint pools are reserved for 
local/private use (which specifying them is not).  I wonder how wide 
IETF or operator consensus is behind this work.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
Ieprep@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep