Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter (Implementation)

In message <OF64D053EF.9356D80E-ON852571F5.0049029B-852571F5.0049CCD8@csc.com>
Janet P Gunn writes:
>  
>  
> You seem to be under the misapprehension that RFC 4412 has not been
> implemented.
>  
> It is being demonstrated at the MultiService Forum's (MSF ) Global MSF
> Interoperability (GMI) 2006 event in October.
>  
> Janet

Thanks for the info.  Actually I thought it would have been
implemented by now and maybe deployed by VOIP providers.  I'm actually
surprised that its not deployed.  [btw- demonstrated on what?]

Henning Schulzrinne seems to have his head in the real world even
though not everything he's pushed for reach fruition.  I thought he'd
at least provide reference implementations as part of his research as
long as he could get the funding to do so.

Regardless, my statement below still stands.  Just had a private email
exchange in which the topic of unfunded mandates vs sufficiently
funded request for competitive bids sort of came up.  Maybe its just
that the former only brings out the spec writers (and hostility from
the ISPs) and the latter produces a more positive and productive
reaction.

[ no funding no action.  what a surprise.  yes I know that has changed. ]

Curtis

> Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com> wrote on 09/26/2006 07:41:36 AM:
> >
> > Maybe IEPREP already has too many spec writers and not enough
> > implementors motivated by deployment intentions.

_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
Ieprep@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep