Re: [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter
Ian Brown <I.Brown@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Wed, 23 February 2005 22:50 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA04479 for <ieprep-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:50:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D45i0-0006cW-Lx for ieprep-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:14:21 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D3t9G-0001k4-J5; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:49:38 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D3t9A-0001iR-Jq for ieprep@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:49:33 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA23938 for <ieprep@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:49:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk ([128.16.5.31]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D3tVh-0004rN-Ap for ieprep@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:12:52 -0500
Received: from 82-35-45-103.cable.ubr02.camd.blueyonder.co.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with UK SMTP id <g.20302-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:49:08 +0000
Message-ID: <421C5183.3050504@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:48:51 +0000
From: Ian Brown <I.Brown@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Bose, Pratik" <pratik.bose@lmco.com>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter
References: <37B6F612D86CA143B5F965E9EE8BD7AA05A1E111@emss04m14.us.lmco.com>
In-Reply-To: <37B6F612D86CA143B5F965E9EE8BD7AA05A1E111@emss04m14.us.lmco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ieprep@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Pratik - this has been a long-running debate. But it does seem logical to have the experts on a particular protocol (the responsible Working Group) be involved in any updates that are required to provide these capabilities. Given that the WGs conduct the vast majority of their work by e-mail, and meet at the physical IETF meetings three times a year, would it be particularly more efficient to try to gather all of this expertise in one place, whether a rechartered IEPREP or a new WG? _______________________________________________ Ieprep mailing list Ieprep@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep
- [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter Bose, Pratik
- Re: [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter Ian Brown
- RE: [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter Ken Carlberg
- Re: [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter Fred Baker
- RE: [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter James M. Polk
- RE: [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter Fred Baker
- RE: [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter Bose, Pratik
- RE: [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter Ken Carlberg
- RE: [Ieprep] Discussion on Charter Fred Baker