Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter?
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 01 July 2005 21:20 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA23667 for <ieprep-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:20:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DoTML-0006g8-Ub for ieprep-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:47:42 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DoSw5-0008W0-Ee; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:20:33 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DoSw3-0008Nt-Iw; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:20:31 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA23652; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:20:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from syd-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.104.193.196]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DoTM4-0006fk-TX; Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:47:26 -0400
Received: from syd-core-1.cisco.com (64.104.193.198) by syd-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 Jul 2005 07:47:35 +1000
Received: from imail.cisco.com (imail.cisco.com [128.107.200.91]) by syd-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j61LJZ91011587; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 07:19:36 +1000 (EST)
Received: from [10.32.244.218] (stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com [10.32.244.218]) by imail.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with SMTP id j61LJUgp015504; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 14:19:30 -0700
In-Reply-To: <011401c57e7f$05227da0$6401a8c0@canondownstairs>
References: <OF162588F5.55F41921-ON85257031.006CE6ED-85257031.006E31C5@csc.com> <011401c57e7f$05227da0$6401a8c0@canondownstairs>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <6cc94ad777b0f294a06fcbd2a1a3aa1d@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter?
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 14:20:06 -0700
To: Jason Michael Canon <fiatlux@adelphia.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622)
IIM-SIG: v:"1.1"; h:"imail.cisco.com"; d:"cisco.com"; z:"home"; m:"krs"; t:"1120252770.694679"; x:"432200"; a:"rsa-sha1"; b:"nofws:431"; e:"Iw=="; n:"sQYarK2E51MdcTiUqeif3F7cWdxIfoCiXhdfb9vD5ee/j0jXL15gbFxF2p" "XIweAblu0N6XAgK7k+wrbr7bQDJaCDqOmzqpRUBjIRQAXQ7NzadpmR3pUL6wxaRUtW+c43sl9jC" "50Qg1sXHpPjt8Y+Y16ioyQAQAdSunM4YhevURc="; s:"GFfY/xEUvALMbokrFfDHgqHFKv0leZqWF6YqB+S6C4BUUlYYQTQbFzdP97K1rCvZR65UC4uQ" "EyFKiLR6eOZA3g5hmM81LF/9zZcox0HujWkTA1gwk+GAUTnBsZJZSFdTuvmaH6Bo5APCcEH0ry8" "kebto7DOi47iWtXIuWJi3RAI="; c:"From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>"; c:"Subject: Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter?"; c:"Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 14:20:06 -0700"
IIM-VERIFY: s:"y"; v:"y"; r:"60"; h:"imail.cisco.com"; c:"message from imail.cisco.com verified; "
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org, jon.peterson@neustar.biz, Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>, "King, Kimberly S." <KIMBERLY.S.KING@saic.com>, ieprep@ietf.org, sob@harvard.edu
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Jul 1, 2005, at 1:54 PM, Jason Michael Canon wrote: > My question is did a public policy debate result in a Congressional > law or FCC Regulation that permits > the ITEM to craft enabling technology? Someone has to pass a law before we get to develop a protocol? What law permitted us to develop the Internet? Please. We are not permitted to do things that law/regulation precludes. If law/regulation doesn't preclude something, we don't have to bow and scrape in front of a regulator to get permission to think about it. _______________________________________________ Ieprep mailing list Ieprep@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep
- [Ieprep] Re-charter? King, Kimberly S.
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter?time slot? Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Jason Michael Canon
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Jason Michael Canon
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Fred Baker
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Steve Silverman
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Janet P Gunn
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Bose, Pratik
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [Sessions?] James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [solutions already?] James M. Polk
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [MLPP limited to privateā¦ James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [IP911 and preemption] James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? James M. Polk
- Re: [Ieprep] Re-charter? [MLPP limited to privateā¦ Janet Gunn
- [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Ken Carlberg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? Dennis Q Berg
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? James M. Polk
- RE: [Ieprep] Re-charter? King, Kimberly S.