IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Wed, 27 September 2006 17:17 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSd2B-0007Tq-0a; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:23 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSd29-0007Og-Mf for ieprep@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:21 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSd28-0007TZ-FC for ieprep@ietf.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:21 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2006 10:17:20 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,225,1157353200"; d="scan'208"; a="43872755:sNHT53074302"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k8RHHKwX013171; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:20 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k8RHHKdM011743; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:20 -0400
Received: from jmpolk-wxp.cisco.com ([10.89.20.100]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:17:19 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20060927121544.02577ef8@email.cisco.com>
X-Sender: jmpolk@email.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:17:18 -0500
To: curtis@occnc.com, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Ieprep] proposed charter
In-Reply-To: <200609262202.k8QM2wLG004265@workhorse.brookfield.occnc.com >
References: <Your message of "Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:27:19 PDT." <2253DBB7-88CD-4E44-B515-58FDC129541F@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2006 17:17:19.0221 (UTC) FILETIME=[C97F7250:01C6E258]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=866; t=1159377440; x=1160241440; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; z=From:=22James=20M.=20Polk=22=20<jmpolk@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[Ieprep]=20proposed=20charter=20 |To:curtis@occnc.com,=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com>; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3D6EtrC7P5eU6sA3JOAE7fXMnRud0=3D; b=b/H5c1Cl1j2BfsKOG7Zkl2PwW6KiT1/QBls7d3tPhvfBJnyPzYZw5WaSch2exrMPC1shrsRq vlOQw7jdlJ7Ps+k4haJIGKGDl8jmeE3G5BAFECO6ei0vdYPVF1mSxWhL;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=jmpolk@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a
Cc: ieprep@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ieprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Emergency Preparedness Working Group <ieprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ieprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep>, <mailto:ieprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ieprep-bounces@ietf.org

At 06:02 PM 9/26/2006 -0400, Curtis Villamizar wrote:

>In message <2253DBB7-88CD-4E44-B515-58FDC129541F@cisco.com>
>Fred Baker writes:
> >
> > or whether drop priority even makes sense operationally, which it
> > doesn't.
> >
> > On Sep 26, 2006, at 4:22 AM, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
> >
> > > For example, it is important
> > > to know how many priority/preemption values there will be and whether
> > > each priority requires three drop preferences as required by an AF
> > > service.
>
>
>Fred,
>
>For PSTN voice it doesn't but for elastic real time or elastic bulk
>transfer it might.  What you are saying is that AF doesn't make sense.

For voice?

>Maybe it doesn't but if so the diffserv WG wasted a lot of time.

Have you looked at who wrote 2597?

>Either that or maybe ETS will never be anything but voice traffic.
>
>Curtis

_______________________________________________
Ieprep mailing list
Ieprep@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieprep

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email