Re: [Ietf-62] Fwd: So more fun for IETF 62.

Joel,
	Ok, sounds fine by me. We've got some folks going to check on physical  
jack locations and numbers in each room mid-week this week. If you have  
any questions regarding the site, yell now :-)

	As for the network, we'll probably still keep you on a separate VLAN.  
Want to give you guys the best chance of everything working, and mixing  
you with the craziness of the IETF wireless crowd probably doesn't  
help.

	So, how is the data actually traveling? You guys gonna just ship the 8  
streams back to UO unicast and then rebroadcast from there? We should  
have some decent bandwidth at the meeting if you want to source some of  
the traffic from there.

	- Jim

	(BTW: jrm@nortelnetworks.com hasn't worked since 2001 :-)   
jim@daedelus.com will work forever)

On Feb 8, 2005, at 1:19 PM, Marcia Beaulieu wrote:

> Message from Joel Jaeggli regarding recording all sessions at the  
> IETF, audio
> only.
>
>> Envelope-to: mbeaulie@foretec.com
>> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:44:48 -0800 (PST)
>> From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
>> X-X-Sender: joelja@twin.uoregon.edu
>> To: Marcia Beaulieu <mbeaulie@ietf.org>
>> cc: jrm@nortelnetworks.com
>> Subject: So more fun for IETF 62.
>> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
>> X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
>>
>> The current version my draft descrbing what we want to do it at:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jaeggli-ietftv-ng-00.txt
>>
>> The practical upshot is there's no need to schedule multicast rooms  
>> specifically... But it does mean I want try and record/broadcast from  
>> all 7 or 8 rooms. The big piece of work is ethernet drops instead of  
>> two I need 8, there's no real reason for them to be on a seperate  
>> netowrk, the wireless network is probably sufficient since it's 8 x  
>> 64Kb/s of unicast traffic rather than ~6mb/s of multicast...
>>
>> joelja
>>
>> --
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---- Joel Jaeggli                Unix Consulting          
>> joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0  
>> 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-62 mailing list
> Ietf-62@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-62

Re: [Ietf-62] Fwd: So more fun for IETF 62.

Attachment: smime.p7s